Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 8;11(1):217–223. doi: 10.1039/c9sc03428e

Investigations into γ- vs. δ-selectivity.

graphic file with name c9sc03428e-u10.jpg
Entrya Product γ : δb ΔΔGc (kcal mol−1) Yieldd
1 graphic file with name c9sc03428e-u11.jpg 4k e ≤−1.77f 83
2 graphic file with name c9sc03428e-u12.jpg 4l >20 : 1 ≤−1.77f 87
3 graphic file with name c9sc03428e-u13.jpg 4m e ≤−1.77f 97
4 graphic file with name c9sc03428e-u14.jpg 4n e ≤−1.77f 63
5 graphic file with name c9sc03428e-u15.jpg 4o 11 : 1 −1.39 79
6 graphic file with name c9sc03428e-u16.jpg 4p 13 : 1 −1.52 70
7 graphic file with name c9sc03428e-u17.jpg 4q 2 : 1 −0.41 98g
8 graphic file with name c9sc03428e-u18.jpg 7r 1 : 2 +0.38 84g
9h graphic file with name c9sc03428e-u19.jpg 10a 3 : 1 −0.69 57g
10h graphic file with name c9sc03428e-u20.jpg 10b 4 : 1 −0.82 67g
a

Conditions A.

b

Determined by 1H or 19F NMR of crude mixture.

c

Calculated from experimental product ratios.

d

Isolated yield of depicted product.

e

δ-Chlorinated-isomer not detected.

f

Calculated assuming ≥20 : 1 ratio of 4 : 7.

g

Isolated as a mixture of γ- and δ-chlorinated isomers.

h

Conditions: 1.0 equiv. N-chlorosulfamate 9, PhH (0.07 M), 2 blue Kessil lamps.11