Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 6;10(47):10843–10848. doi: 10.1039/c9sc04434e

Fig. 3. A dual-reporter, calibration-free sensor for ATP. (A) Challenging a training set of dual-reporter, ATP-detecting sensors with their target in undiluted whole blood, we again see significant variation in the absolute currents produced by the two reporters. (B) The ratio of their currents, however, is again quite reproducible from one sensor to the next. We employed this data set to derive the parameters rmin, rmax, nH and K1/2 for this class of sensors. (C) Applying these parameters to perform calibration-free measurements to a new, out-of-training-set group of sensors we reproducibly achieved ATP concentration estimates (in undiluted whole blood) within 20% of the actual (spiked) concentration across an approximate 30-fold concentration range (black symbols, see individual sensors in Fig. S2), a level of accuracy we achieved by calibrating the same sensors in a sample of known (here zero) target concentration (blue symbols). Specifically, both approaches achieved limits of detection of ∼300 μM, defined as the concentration of target that produces a signal of iMB/iAQ three times the average noise level of a signal of iMB_0/iAQ_0 obtained in the absence of target.

Fig. 3