Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 24;479(6):1333–1343. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001583

Table 3.

Economic impact of injury based on a minimum of 6 months follow-up

Economic outcomes % (n)
Returned to work, % (n) 65 (71 of 110)
Absenteeism from work in months, median (IQR) 7 (5-11)
Return to same employer, % (n) 76 (54 of 71)
Return to same income or higher income, % (n) 69 (49 of 71)
Return to same duties, % (n) 68 (48 of 71)
Productivity level at the last follow-up visit,a median (IQR) 9 (8-10)
Work status at the last follow-up visit, % (n)
 Working 43 (71 of 164)
 Unable to work 25 (41 of 164)
 Searching or training for work 16 (27 of 164)
 Sick leave 5 (9 of 164)
 Retired 4 (6 of 164)
 Other 6 (10 of 164)
Disability compensation, % (n)
 None 82 (135 of 164)
 Disability benefits from employer 6 (9 of 164)
 Disability benefits from government 6 (9 of 164)
 Workers compensation 4 (7 of 164)
 Disability benefits from other sources 2 (4 of 164)
Accumulated debt, % (n) 45 (74 of 164)
 Estimated debt from injury in USD, median (range)b 6000 (640-130,000)
 Debt to income ratio, median (range)b 0.18 (0.01-4.0)
a

Subjective assessment on a scale of 1 to 10.

b

Includes only the 74 participants who incurred debt.