Table 2.
Factors | Predictor | Means | Difference in Means | OLS Regression Coefficients | Contrib. of Differences in Levels of Exposure | Contrib. of Differences in ‘Effects’ / Slopes | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | Sig | (5) | Sig | (6)b | (7)c | ||
βW | βB | |||||||||
School Factors (H1) | Proportion Black or Hispanic Students at Start of Elementary School | 0.317 | 0.801 | −0.484 | 0.127 | ** | 0.023 | 0.011 | −0.033 | |
Proportion Free-or-Reduced-Price Lunch (FRPL) Students at Start of Elementary School | 0.386 | 0.696 | −0.310 | −0.036 | 0.101 | 0.031 | 0.053 | |||
Behavior Factors (H2-H3) | Average of Teacher- and Parent-Reported Externalizing Problems Score, Age 5 | 10.091 | 11.200 | −1.108 | 0.007 | *** | 0.017 | *** | 0.018 | 0.095 |
Controls | Family Income-to-Poverty Ratio, Age 5 | 3.162 | 1.456 | 1.707 | −0.006 | ** | −0.011 | 0.019 | −0.017 | |
Mother Has Some College or College Degree, Age 1 | 0.556 | 0.305 | 0.251 | −0.029 | −0.039 | 0.010 | −0.005 | |||
Father Absent from Household at Any Wave, Age 5 | 0.476 | 0.832 | −0.356 | 0.009 | 0.032 | 0.011 | 0.011 | |||
Father has Ever Been in Jail or Prison, Age 5 | 0.354 | 0.550 | −0.196 | 0.027 | 0.021 | 0.004 | −0.002 | |||
Child’s PPVT Cognitive Score, Age 5 | 103.101 | 91.260 | 11.841 | 0.001 | * | 0.002 | ** | −0.024 | 0.080 | |
Child’s Sex (Male=1), Age 1 | 0.526 | 0.519 | 0.007 | 0.053 | ** | 0.168 | *** | −0.001 | 0.060 | |
Child’s Age (in Months), Age 9 | 111.731 | 112.274 | −0.543 | 0.000 | −0.001 | −0.001 | −0.143 | |||
Mother’s Age, Age 1 | 26.931 | 24.287 | 2.644 | −0.002 | −0.001 | 0.002 | 0.025 | |||
Constant | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.000 | −0.143 | −0.140 | 0.000 | 0.003 | |||
Observations (N) | 700 | 1696 | 700 | 1696 | ||||||
Overall Contribution of to the Racial Gap of Differences in Levels vs Slopes in Percentage-Point Units (/100): | 0.081 | 0.127 | ||||||||
Proportion of the Overall Race Gap Driven by Differences in Levels vs. Effects/Slopes: | 0.389 | 0.611 |
p<0.001,
p<0.01,
p<0.05,
p<0.10 (two-tailed t-tests for a statistically significant difference from 0).
Controls and the constant are included in the decomposition but not shown (see Appendix for complete decomposition table).
This model uses Black children’s coefficients as the reference when calculating each variable’s contribution to the gap in schooling due to racial differences in mean levels and Black children’s means as the reference when calculating each variable’s contribution due to racial differences in coefficients (i.e., “effects”).
Values in Column (6) are multiplied by −1 (to achieve positive values for gap-widening contributions and vice versa for gap-narrowing contributions).
Values in Column (7) are multiplied by −1 (to achieve positive values for gap-widening contributions and negative values for gap-narrowing contributions).
Source: Fragile Families and Child Well-Being Study, Waves 1–5. Sample is restricted to the 2,396 Black and White boys and girls who remained in the study from birth (wave 1) through age 9 (wave 5). Multiple imputation of 20 datasets is used to handle item-missingness on all but the dependent variable (suspension/expulsion).