Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 20;24(2):465–481. doi: 10.1038/s41391-020-00301-4

Table 3.

Risk of bias of included studies.

Outcome Randomisation process Deviation from intended interventions Missing outcome data Measurement of the outcome Selection of the reported result Overall bias
Fatigue, n = 14
  Low risk 14 (100%) 14 (100%) 14 (100%) 14 (100%) 13 (92.9%) 13 (92.9%)
  Some concerns 0 0 0 0 1 (7.1%) 1 (7.1%)
  High risk 0 0 0 0 0 0
Quality of life, n = 15
  Low risk 14 (93.3%) 15 (100%) 15 (100%) 15 (100%) 14 (93.3%) 13 (86.7%)
  Some concerns 1 (6.7%) 0 0 0 1 (6.7%) 2 (13.3%)
  High risk 0 0 0 0 0 0
Depression, n = 4
  Low risk 3 (75.0%) 4 (100%) 4 (100%) 4 (100%) 4 (100%) 3 (75.0%)
  Some concerns 1 (25.0%) 0 0 0 0 1 (25.0%)
  High risk 0 0 0 0 0 0
Anxiety, n = 3
  Low risk 2 (66.7%) 3 (100%) 3 (100%) 3 (100%) 3 (100%) 2 (66.7%)
  Some concerns 1 (33.3%) 0 0 0 0 1 (33.3%)
  High risk 0 0 0 0 0 0

n number of studies.