Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun;20(6):437–447. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00075-2

Table 3.

Comparison of RESTART and the pooled cohort of OXVASC and LATCH using all follow-up data

RESTART (all; n=537) RESTART (without antiplatelet therapy; n=269) Pooled OXVASC plus LATCH (fulfilling RESTART eligibility criteria;*n=246) p value
Baseline characteristics
Mean age, years 76 76 79 0·00010
Sex
Male 360 (67%) 187 (70%) 118 (48%) <0·0001
Female 177 (33%) 82 (30%) 128 (52%) ..
Previous hypertension 401 (75%) 207 (77%) 198 (80%) 0·33
Previous diabetes 127 (24%) 70 (26%) 42 (17%) 0·013
Previous atrial fibrillation 92 (17%) 50 (19%) 130 (53%) <0·0001
Lobar ICH location 332 (62%) 166 (62%) 116 (47%) 0·00094
Risk of outcomes
Recurrent ICH
Number 35 23 13 ..
Rate (95% CI), per 100 patient-years 3·3 (2·2–4·4) 4·4 (2·6–6·1) 3·5 (1·9–6·0) 0·52
Ischaemic stroke
Number 46 27 13 ..
Rate (95% CI), per 100 patient-years 4·4 (3·2–5·7) 5·3 (3·3–7·2) 3·4 (1·9–5·9) 0·19

ICH=intracerebral haemorrhage. OXVASC=Oxford Vascular Study. LATCH=Lothian Audit of the Treatment of Cerebral Haemorrhage.

*

Patients in OXVASC and LATCH taking antithrombotic drugs before ICH for atrial fibrillation, previous transient ischaemic attack, ischaemic stroke, stroke of unknown subtype, peripheral artery disease, or myocardial infarction.

Data missing for one patient.