Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 8;46(7):1324–1332. doi: 10.1038/s41386-021-01002-9

Table 2.

Genes with FDR < 0.05 and highlighted as interesting in previous literature.

Previous studies Our study
Gene N Test Direction Test Average exp Effect size (SE) p value Direction
YWHAZ [14] 87 R vs. NR (W4) R↑ TR (W8) 3607.28 0.0014 (0.0015) 0.3509 TR↓
NLGN2 [14] 84 R vs. NR (W12) R↓ TR (W8) 0
NLGN2 [14] 61 R vs. NR (BL) R↓ TR (BL) 0
NR2C2 [14] 84 R vs. NR (W12) R↓ TR (W8) 536.27 0.0019 (0.0028) 0.4814 TR↓
ZNF641 [14] 84 R vs. NR (W12) R↓ TR (W8) 423.28 0.00077 (0.0026) 0.7648 TR↓
FKBP1A [14] 84 R vs. NR (W12) R↑ TR (W8) 433.95 −0.0024 (0.0021) 0.2541 TR↑
SMAD7 [10] 77 R vs. NR (BL) R↓ TR (BL) 110.28 0.0012 (0.0028) 0.6640 TR↓
SIGLECP3 [10] 77 R vs. NR (BL) R↓ TR (BL) 23.93
MMP28 [15] 39 TR (W8) TR↑ TR (W8) 0.60
KXD1 [15] 39 TR (W8) TR↓ TR (W8) 89.01 0.0030 (0.0029) 0.3003 TR↓
IRF7 [11] 63 TR (BL) TR↑ TR (BL) 0.69

R = responders or remitters definitions are different between studies; TR↑ = increased expression result in greater response; R↑ = responders have higher expression compared to NR; – = have less than six counts for more than 200 patients.

NR non-responders, TR treatment response (continious varibale).