Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 21;15(2):479–490. doi: 10.1007/s12105-020-01225-0

Table 3.

Comparison of various parameters among myoepithelial tumors

Variables ME MECA P value
Total cases 6 9
Age range (Median) 37(21, 60) 51(32, 83) 0.272
Gender 2:1 1:1.2
 Male 4(66.7) 5(44.4) 0.608
 Female 2(33.3) 4(55.6)
Tumor cell type 0.776
 Epithelioid 4(66.67) 4(44.44)
 Clear cell 0(0) 2(22.22)
 Mixed 2(33.3) 3(33.33)
Architecture 0.053
 Multinodular 0(0) 5(55.56)
 Sheet like 5(83.33) 4(44.44)
 Trabecular 1(16.67) 0(0)
Tumor matrix 1.000
 Hyalinized 4(66.67) 6(66.67)
 Myxoid 2(33.33) 3(33.33)
 Cytologic atypia Mild Moderate to marked
Tumor borders
Invasive pattern (focal to extensive invasion) 0 9
Circumscribed 6 0
Necrosis 0 7
Lymphovascular invasion 0 2
Perineural invasion 0 2
Mitosis/10 HPF (range) 1–3 3–20
MIB-1 LI range (%) 1–3 3–60
Prognosis

4 NED and followed for 4, 44, 54 and 54 mo

0 DOD

0 REC

0 METS

2 LOF

3 NED and followed for 19, 30 and 45 mo

2 DOD at 8 & 40 mo

4 REC

1 METS

3 LOF

DOD died of disease, HPF high power field, LOF lost to followup, LI labelling index, ME myoepithelioma, MECA myoepithelial carcinoma, METS metastasis, mo months, NED no evidence of disease, REC recurrence