Skip to main content
. 2021 May 10;6(3):100115. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100115

Table 2.

Hazard ratio based on method of propensity score analysis

Method TD-TKI (primary endpoint)
Overall survival (secondary endpoint)
N HR (95% CI) P value N HR (95% CI) P value
IPTW 540 1.146 (0.929-1.414) 0.204 540 1.470 (1.070-2.021) 0.018
Sensitivity analysis
 Unadjusted 550 1.090 (0.814-1.459) 0.565 550 1.217 (0.783-1.893) 0.383
 Matching (1 to 1) 376 1.010 (0.701-1.455) 0.959 376 1.141 (0.639-2.037) 0.657
 Stabilized IPTW 540 1.134 (0.842-1.528) 0.408 540 1.450 (0.924-2.275) 0.106
 Truncated IPTW 529 1.169 (0.943-1.450) 0.155 529 1.385 (0.998-1.922) 0.052
Method TTF (secondary endpoint)
PFS (secondary endpoint)
N HR (95% CI) P value N HR (95% CI) P value
IPTW 540 0.924 (0.755-1.131) 0.443 540 1.020 (0.812-1.281) 0.864
Sensitivity analysis
 Unadjusted 550 0.882 (0.667-1.167) 0.379 550 0.980 (0.716-1.340) 0.898
 Matching (1 to 1) 376 0.817 (0.575-1.163) 0.262 376 1.003 (0.686-1.468) 0.987
 Stabilized IPTW 540 0.914 (0.687-1.214) 0.534 540 1.000 (0.726-1.377) >0.99
 Truncated IPTW 529 0.932 (0.758-1.145) 0.501 529 1.038 (0.825-1.305) 0.751

CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting; PFS., progression-free survival.