Skip to main content
. 2021 May 10;6(3):100150. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100150

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariable analyses of overall survival in patients treated with IT therapy

Categories N Univariate Cox model (N = 312)
Multivariable Cox model (N = 312)
Hazard ratio 95% CI P value Hazard ratio 95% CI P value
IT therapy initiation period
 2008-2012 74 1 0.947
 2012-2018 238 0.99 0.74-1.32
Age at MBC, years
 <55 175 1 0.618
 ≥55 137 0.94 0.73-1.20
Time to MBC, months
 <6 87 1 0.302
 6-24 52 1.03 0.71-1.50
 24-60 69 0.85 0.60-1.22
 ≥60 102 0.77 0.56-1.07
ECOG performance status at initiation of IT therapy
 PS 0-1 49 1 0.014 1 0.2
 PS 2 42 0.95 0.58-1.55 0.95 0.58-1.56
 PS 3-4 48 1.84 1.18-2.88 1.47 0.93-2.34
 PS NA 173 1.39 0.97-1.98 1.3 0.9-1.88
BC subtype
 HR+/HER2− 168 1 <0.001 1 <0.001
 HER2+ 47 0.96 0.65-1.42 0.92 0.62-1.38
 TN 77 1.87 1.39-2.51 1.81 1.32-2.47
 NA 20 1.43 0.88-2.32 1.12 0.68-1.83
Number of metastatic sites (excluding CNS) at initiation of IT therapy
 <3 160 1 0.088 1 <0.001
 ≥3 152 1.24 0.97-1.59 1.33 1.01-1.74
Treatment line at initiation of IT therapy
 Line 1 62 1 0.004 1 <0.001
 Line 2 88 1.52 1.06-2.18 1.44 0.99-2.1
 Line ≥3 162 1.74 1.24-2.45 1.88 1.30-2.73
Concomitant systemic therapy
 No 140 1 <0.001 1 <0.001
 Yes 172 0.50 0.38-0.64 0.47 0.35-0.62
Intrathecal agent
 Methotrexate 206 1 0.051 1 <0.001
 Cytarabine/Thiotepa 106 1.29 1-1.67 1.68 1.28-2.22
Concomitant RT
 No 273 1 0.748
 Yes 39 0.94 0.66-1.35
Univariate Cox model for the scores evaluated
N Hazard ratio 95% CI P value
Curie scorea
 0 40 1 <0.001
 1 123 1.31 0.87-1.98
 2-3 149 2.13 1.43-3.19
Breast-GPAa,b
 0.0-1.0 74 1 <0.001
 1.5-2.0 154 0.6 0.45-0.82
 2.5-4.0 63 0.46 0.31-0.68

BC, breast cancer; CI, confidence interval; CNS, central nervous system; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; GPA, graded prognostic assessment; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR, hormone receptor; IT, intrathecal; MBC, metastatic breast cancer; NA, not available; PS, performance status; RT, radiotherapy; TN, triple negative.

a

Because only eight patients had a Curie score of 3 and only four patients had a Breast-GPA score of 3.5-4.0, these patients were grouped with patients with a Curie score of 2 and a Breast-GPA score of 2.5-3.0, respectively.

b

Twenty-one patients had Breast-GPA NA due to missing data for BC subtype.