Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 4;45(3):420–432. doi: 10.1016/j.jgr.2020.08.006

Table 2.

Quality assessment of studies included in systematic review of antidepressant effects of ginsenosides following modified scale of CAMARADES

First author, year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Quality score
Chen 2019 [30] 8
Cui 2012 [31] 8
Duong 2016 [32] 8
Fan 2018a [37] 7
Fan 2018b [38] 5
Huang 2013 [42] 5
Jiang 2012 [23] 7
Jin 2017 [43] 7
Kang 2017 [29] 7
Kim 2019 [22] 6
Lee 2012 [40] 7
Liu 2016 [36] 7
Mou 2017 [41] 7
Ren 2017 [24] 7
Wang 2017 [33] 8
Wu 2012 [44] 5
Xu 2017 [27] 7
Yao 2012 [28] 7
You 2017 [25] 7
Yu 2018 [39] 7
Zhang 2017 [26] 7
Zheng 2014 [35] 7
Zhu 2016 [34] 8

Studies fulfilling the criteria of: (1) peer reviewed publication; (2) control of temperature; (3) random allocation to groups; (4) blinded induction of depression; (5) blinded assessment of behavioral outcome; (6) use of anesthetic without significant intrinsic neuroprotective activity; (7) calculation of the sample size necessary to achieve sufficient power; (8) appropriate animal model which uses animals without relevant comorbidities (aged, diabetic, or hypertensive); (9) compliance with animal welfare regulations; (10) statement of potential conflict of interest.