Table 2.
CCT results of study population (n = 65)
| CCT parameters | Total population (n = 65) | Males (n = 42) | Females (n = 23) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Radiation (mSV ± SD) | 1.1 ± 0.6 | 1.3 ± 0.6 | 0.7 ± 0.4 |
| Resting HR (beats/min ± SD) | 54 ± 10 | 53 ± 8 | 56 ± 12 |
| Beta blocker administered, n (%) | 26 (40) | 13 (31) | 13 (57) |
| CCT quality | |||
| Good to excellent, n (%) | 61 (94) | 40 (95) | 21 (91) |
| Fair, n (%) | 4 (6) | 2 (5) | 2 (9) |
| Positive CCT, n (%) | 13 (20) | 10 (24) | 3 (13) |
| Negative CCT, n (%) | 52 (80) | 32 (76) | 20 (87) |
| Plaque type | |||
| Calcific, n (%) | 9 (69) | 7 (70) | 2 (66) |
| Noncalcific, n (%) | 3 (23) | 2 (20) | 1 (33) |
| Mixed, n (%) | 1 (8) | 1 (10) | 0 (0) |
| Number of atherosclerotic lesions diagnosed by CCT (n) | 34 | 27 | 7 |
| Mean lesions per positive CCT (n ± SD) | 2.6 ± 1.5 | 2.7 ± 1.5 | 2.3 ± 1.5 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD.
CCT, coronary computed tomography; HR, heart rate; mSV, millisievert; SD, standard deviation.