Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Eat Disord. 2020 May 2;53(6):852–863. doi: 10.1002/eat.23282

Table 4.

Perceived support, online interactions, and likeliness to accept emotional support (N = 598 unless otherwise noted)

Total Clinical ED
(n= 142)
Subclinical ED
(n= 358)
No ED
(n=98)
p-value Pairwise comparisons
n (%) or Mean [SD]
Online social support score (range 1 to 5) (n=542) 3.53 [1.06] 3.74 [1.03] 3.49 [1.17] 3.38 [0.98] 0.023 Clinical ED > Subclinical ED, No ED
Preference for online social interaction score (range 1 to 5) (n=556) 3.30 [1.03] 3.43 [1.05] 3.28 [1.03] 3.15 [1.03] 0.113 --
Accepting emotional support from individuals on social media (People may choose more than one)
 Someone you know 341 (57.02) 67 (47.18) 208 (58.10) 66 (67.35) 0.007 No ED, Subclinical ED > Clinical ED
 Someone you didn’t know 228 (38.13) 67 (47.18) 135 (37.71) 26 (26.53) 0.005 Clinical ED, Subclinical ED > No ED
 Your health professional 250 (41.81) 46 (32.39) 151 (42.18) 53 (54.08) 0.009 No ED > Subclinical ED > Clinical ED
 A health professional you didn’t know 159 (26.59) 36 (25.35) 91 (25.42) 32 (32.65) 0.331 --
Response type (Among those who posted on social media, n=413) 0.002
 People are mostly positive. 154 (25.75) 50 (35.21) 84 (23.46) 20 (20.41) Clinical ED > Subclinical ED
 People are sometimes positive. 136 (22.74) 34 (23.94) 86 (24.02) 16 (16.33) --
 People are sometimes positive and sometimes negative 98 (16.39) 20 (14.08) 64 (17.88) 14 (14.29) --
 People are sometimes negative. 16 (2.68) 6 (4.34) 9 (2.51) 1 (1.02) --
 People are mostly negative. 9 (1.51) 2 (1.41) 7 (1.96) 0 --

Note: Pairwise comparisons listed were significant at least at p <0.05.