Skip to main content
. 2021 May 19;22:256. doi: 10.1186/s12859-021-04180-x

Table 2.

Sensitivity and specificity for two pseudogene filtering methods

Experiment Dataset Type of mutations Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%)
ORFfinder ORFfinder + profile HMM analysis ORFfinder ORFfinder + profile HMM analysis
Artificial DNA barcoding dataset. COI genes and nuMTs from 10 species Full length COI barcode and nuMT sequences N/A 70 73 90 90
Perturbed community dataset Full length COI barcode and simulated nuMTs GC—> AT 31 27 99  ~ 100
Perturbed community dataset Full length COI barcode and simulated nuMTs Frameshift 88 94  ~ 100  ~ 100
Perturbed community dataset Short COI barcode and simulated nuMTs GC—> AT 17**—50* 6**—15* 99  ~ 100
Perturbed community dataset Short COI barcode and simulated nuMTs Frameshift 42**—58* 61**—87* 99 99*—~ 100**
Perturbed community dataset Full length COI barcode and twice as many nuMTs GC—> AT 17 0 99  ~ 100
Perturbed community dataset Full length COI barcode and twice as many nuMTs Frameshift 0 0  ~ 100  ~ 100
Perturbed community dataset Full length COI barcode and half as many nuMTs GC—> AT 39 36 95 96
Perturbed community dataset Full length COI barcode and half as many nuMTs Frameshift 95 98 96 99

Sensitivity refers to the true positive rate, our ability to correctly identify known or simulated nuMTs. Specificity refers to the true negative rate, our ability to correctly identify COI genes. * 5’ fragment. ** 3’ fragment