Table 4.

Comparison of the OLS, SAR and GWR models for LOS in MCO and SSR facilities

Predictor variables	OLS		SAR		GWR
	Coefficients	Std Error	Coefficients	Std Error	Coefficients	Std Error(mean)
LOS_MCO
ISA_MCO	− 0.161***	0.037	0.015	0.024	[− 55.959; 8.438]	0.037
APL_GPs	− 1.065**	0.097	− 0.348***	0.061	[− 37.882; 37.084]	0.097
APL_Nurses	0.302***	0.096	0.005	0.065	[− 39.567; 78.291]	0.097
APL_Physiotherapists	− 1.518***	0.165	− 0.953***	0.108	[− 26.147; 33.852]	0.164
Non− Owner	− 1.395***	0.117	− 0.244***	0.076	[− 4.631; 2.412]	0.116
Precarious	− 0.507	0.403	− 0.415	0.253	[− 13.835; 10.757]	0.39
Spatial parameters
Spatial Lag Coefficient ρ			0.767***
Bandwidth GWR					Adaptive, 0.38% nearest neighbouring IRIS
Model assessment
Adjusted R2	0.508		0.775		0.955
AIC	3285.273		2238.6		539.139
Moran’s I residuals	0.609***		0.031*		0.086***
LOS_SSR
ISA_SSR	0.245***	0.036	0.131	0.023	[− 7.808; 4.756]	4.241
APL_GPs	0.332***	0.096	0.034	0.06	[–33.213; 57.124]	0.931
APL_Nurses	− 1.367***	0.09	− 0.423***	0.063	[− 28.11; 25.561]	1.124
APL_Physiotherapists	− 1.679***	0.165	− 1.048***	0.108	[− 20.186; 18.678]	0.811
Non− Owner	− 1.209***	0.114	− 0.169***	0.073	[− 4.631; 2.412]	1.133
Precarious	− 0.491	0.384	− 0.452	0.241	[− 7.075; 9.112]	0.473
Spatial parameters
Spatial Lag Coefficient ρ			0.764***
Bandwidth GWR					Adaptive, 0.52% nearest neighbouring IRIS
Model assessment					0.931
Adjusted R2	0.485		0.769		939.464
AIC	3255.05		2181.912		0.131***
Moran’s I residuals	0.611***		0.032*

** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; Std Error: Standard deviation error