Skip to main content
. 2021 May 19;11(5):e043523. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043523

Table 3.

Cost-effectiveness results for each analysis scenario

Analysis scenario Incremental cost (£)*, 95% CI, p value Incremental effect (HbA1c in mmol/mol), 95% CI, p value ICER†, 95% CI, p value, quadrant Cost-effectiveness probability for given WTP (%)
£5000 £10 000 £15 000
Direct healthcare perspective −2182 to –2783 to −1581, <0.001 −0 to –6 to 6, 0.923 7434, –73369 to 88237, 0.857 dominant 51.2 48.8 48.1
Direct healthcare + patient/carer perspective −2520 to –3465 to −1576, <0.001 −0 to –6 to 6, 0.923 8585, –91610 to 108781, 0.867 dominant 51.9 49.6 48.3
Sensitivity analysis −1600 to –2198 to −1002, <0.001 −0 to –6 to 6, 0.923 5451, –57926 to 68828, 0.866, dominant 50.3 48.4 47.6

*Difference in cost between home and hospital management.

†(£ saved per additional unit change in HbA1c (mmol/mol)).

HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; WTP, willing to pay.