Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 20.
Published in final edited form as: Am Indian Alsk Native Ment Health Res. 2019;26(2):123–133. doi: 10.5820/aian.2602.2019.123

Table 1.

Study participant demographics at baseline (mean ± SE)

Control n = 30 Intervention n = 30 p-value
Age (y) 25.7 ± .49 25.9 ± .57 .75
Married (no/yes) 21/9 18/11 .52
Education (HS/HS+) 11/18 15/15 .35
Taking Classes (no/yes) 23/7 23/7 1.0
Employed Full-time (no/yes) 14/16 19/11 .19
Annual Household Income (<6k, 6k+) 12/18 8/22 .27
Social Readjustment Rating Scale 441 ± 151 503 ± 134 .76
Hierarchy of Needs Assessment
Deficiency Motivators (0–4) 2.5 ± .27 3.0 ± .22 .11
Growth Motivators (0–4) 2.4 ± .24 2.9 ± .23 .17
Total score (0–8) 4.9 ± .44 5.9 ± .40 .09
Global Well-Being (0–110) 73.5 ± 4.1 76.7 ± 3.5 .56
Self-Efficacy
Important to complete goals 8.6 ± .34 8.8 ± .36 .72
Confident in completing goals 7.6 ± .38 7.5 ± .41 .97
Health Locus of Control
Internal 28.7 ± 1.1 30.6 ± .76 .17
Chance 19.6 ± .70 18.7 ± 1.1 .47
Powerful Others 21.3 ± .75 22.6 ± 1.1 .37

Continuous variables compared using independent t-test

Categorical variables compared using chi-squared test