Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 9;24(Suppl 1):30–39. doi: 10.1111/hex.12990

Table 2.

Overview of observation protocol and questionnaire components, including observation levels and questionnaire mean scores

  Observation level (Frequency) Mean score (Out of 5)
interpersonal relations
Positive interactions (+) High 4.2
Reference to advisors’ expertise (+) Low/Moderate 4.1
Linguistic barriers to advisor participation (−) High 3.4
Advisors showing a lack of interest or being disengaged (−) Moderate 1.3
nature of advisor contributions
Invitations to speak (+) High 4.8
Taking the initiative to speak (+) Moderate/High 2.3
Passively agreeing with researchers (−) Low 1.7
Offering insights appearing irrelevant to discussions (−) Low 2.8
how advisors guided research development
Challenging and suggesting alternatives to researchers (+) Moderate 2.9
Incorporation of advisors’ ideas in research planning (+) Low 3.9
Ideas being ignored/treated with disregard (−) Low 1.1
Decisions made without the input of advisors (−) Low 1.9