Table 3.

Summary comparison of LPA models

	Model
	1-Profile	2-Profile	3-Profile	4-Profile	5-Profile	6-Profile	7-Profile
LL	− 5653.22	− 5435.85	− 5273.90	− 5199.44	− 5043.68	− 5023.93	− 4935.47
BIC	11,433.55	11,131.69	10,940.69	10,924.65	10,774.91	10,839.39	10,795.36
CAIC	11,455.55	11,176.69	11,008.69	11,015.65	10,893.91	10,976.39	10,955.36
SABIC	11,363.77	10,988.95	10,725.00	10,636.00	10,397.46	10,404.85	10,287.86
Entropy	1.0	.80	.87	.87	.87	.87	.89
Smallest profile (%)	–	36.5	15.4	6.8	11.6	6.3	3.8

Bold values represent a best-fitting model. N = 323

LL model log-likelihood, BIC Bayesian information criterion, CAIC consistent Akaike information criterion, SABIC sample-size adjusted BIC