Table 3.
Dentist-caregiver agreement2,3 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overall | Non-acceptable/intervention recommended4 | Acceptable/no intervention recommended5 | |||||
n | % | κ | n | % | n | % | |
Chewing problems* | 189 | 78.6 | 0.56 | 111 | 79.2 | 79 | 77.6 |
Pain/discomfort* | 206 | 86.6 | 0.41 | 16 | 53.6 | 191 | 91.1 |
Dry mouth* | 190 | 80.2 | 0.60 | 89 | 84.7 | 102 | 76.7 |
Denture hygiene+ | 106 | 61.8 | 0.28 | 35 | 36.7 | 71 | 92.9 |
Oral hygiene+ | 71 | 54.0 | 0.13 | 55 | 49.7 | 16 | 77.1 |
Teeth+ | 102 | 69.9 | 0.29 | 82 | 72.2 | 21 | 62.1 |
Gums+1 | 138 | 55.8 | 0.15 | 40 | 29.4 | 99 | 86.7 |
Tongue+ | 187 | 76.5 | 0.18 | 13 | 47.6 | 174 | 79.9 |
Palate/lips/cheeks+ | 184 | 74.0 | 0.23 | 21 | 35.3 | 164 | 85.9 |
Assistance with hygiene | 141 | 56.1 | 0.23 | 81 | 44.8 | 60 | 86.7 |
Referral to dentist | 228 | 87.7 | 0.39 | 216 | 92.0 | 12 | 54.5 |
1In patients without teeth or implant-based retainers, gum tissue of the edentulous ridges was assessed.
2Arithmetic mean over all caregivers
3Registrations were not considered in the analysis if the outcome was absent.
4Calculation according to sensitivity
5Calculation according to specificity
*Registered based on client self-reports. Assessors turned to family/other caregivers when clients were not able to communicate
+Registered based on inspection of the mouth. To collect the presented data, dentists used a standard dental mirror and a dental explorer. Caregivers did not apply any diagnostic instruments