Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 16;25(6):3475–3486. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03669-8

Table 3.

Dentist-caregiver agreement

Dentist-caregiver agreement2,3
Overall Non-acceptable/intervention recommended4 Acceptable/no intervention recommended5
n % κ n % n %
Chewing problems* 189 78.6 0.56 111 79.2 79 77.6
Pain/discomfort* 206 86.6 0.41 16 53.6 191 91.1
Dry mouth* 190 80.2 0.60 89 84.7 102 76.7
Denture hygiene+ 106 61.8 0.28 35 36.7 71 92.9
Oral hygiene+ 71 54.0 0.13 55 49.7 16 77.1
Teeth+ 102 69.9 0.29 82 72.2 21 62.1
Gums+1 138 55.8 0.15 40 29.4 99 86.7
Tongue+ 187 76.5 0.18 13 47.6 174 79.9
Palate/lips/cheeks+ 184 74.0 0.23 21 35.3 164 85.9
Assistance with hygiene 141 56.1 0.23 81 44.8 60 86.7
Referral to dentist 228 87.7 0.39 216 92.0 12 54.5

1In patients without teeth or implant-based retainers, gum tissue of the edentulous ridges was assessed.

2Arithmetic mean over all caregivers

3Registrations were not considered in the analysis if the outcome was absent.

4Calculation according to sensitivity

5Calculation according to specificity

*Registered based on client self-reports. Assessors turned to family/other caregivers when clients were not able to communicate

+Registered based on inspection of the mouth. To collect the presented data, dentists used a standard dental mirror and a dental explorer. Caregivers did not apply any diagnostic instruments