Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 26;25(6):4031–4043. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03734-2

Table 4.

Patients were divided into six different patient groups based on their health status

Patient groups (N = 517) Total subjects for each patient group Age: mean ± SD* % of woman/men* Number of medication; median ± IQR * Total XI-scores: median ± IQR* UWS: median ± IQR* pH UWS: median ± IQR CH-SWS: median ± IQR* pH CH-SWS: median ± IQR A-SWS: median ± IQR* pH A-SWS: median ± IQR*
Controls 136 50.6 ± 17.7 64.2: 35.8 27.0 ± 19.0–34.0 0.22 ± 0.07–0.36 6.50 ± 6.10–7.00 0.76 ± 0.44–1.33 7.00 ± 6.70–7.00 1.62 ± 1.01–2.20 4.70 ± 4.40–5.80
Low Med patients 157 60.7 ± 14.8a 68.2: 31.8 2 ± 1 – 2a 30.0 ± 22.0–37.0a 0.17 ± 0.07–0.32 6.50 ± 6.10–7.00 0.72 ± 0.39–1.18 7.00 ± 6.50–7.00 1.17 ± 0.71–1.80a 4.70 ± 4.00–6.10
High Med patients 140 65.9 ± 13.1a,b 65.7: 34.3 6 ± 4 – 9a,b 33.0 ± 24.0–40.0a,b 0.11 ± 0.04–0.30a,b 6.5− ± 5.80–6.90 0.57 ± 0.27–1.08a 7.00–6.10-7.00 0.95 ± 0.44–1.50a,b 4.40 ± 4.00–5.00a,b
RTX patients 10 58.7 ± 17.9 40.0: 60.0 1 ± 0 – 1a,b,c 37.5 ± 31.0–43.8a,b 0.13 ± 0.05–0.23 6.10 ± 5.65–6.90 0.45 ± 0.29–0.76 7.00 ± 6.40–7.00 0.52 ± 0.24–0.95a,b 4.55 ± 4.15–5.08
SS patients 46 61.7 ± 14.0a 84.8: 15.2a,b,c,d 2 ± −2a,b,c,d 44.0 ± 37.0–49.8a,b,c 0.08 ± 0.03–0.16a,b 6.50 ± 6.00–6.80 0.30 ± 0.05–0.61a,b,c 6.90 ± 6.10–7.00 0.50 ± 0.23–1.15a,b,c 4.40 ± 4.00–5.00a,b
SS + High Med patients 22 62.1 ± 9.1a 95.5: 4.5a,b,c,d 7 ± 5 – 9a,b,d,e 46.0 ± 37.5–49.5a,b,c,d 0.06 ± 0.03–0.16a,b 6.50 ± 5.50–7.00 0.28 ± 0.14–0.56a,b,c 7.00 ± 6.50–7.00 0.48 ± 0.23–1.35a,b 4.40 ± 4.00–4.70a,b

Several patient characteristics for the six groups are shown; age, distribution of women and men in each group, the total number of medications used, the total XI-scores, salivary flow rates (in mL/min), and the salivary pH of UWS, CH-SWS, and A-SWS. The age is presented as mean with standard deviation (SD). For the number of medications used, the total XI-scores, salivary flow rates, and salivary pH, the median with corresponding interquartile range (IQR) is shown. The distribution of women and men is given in percentages

*Significant differences between the six patient groups, Kruskal-Wallis test p < 0.01

aMann-Whitney U test: p < 0.05 vs. controls

bMann-Whitney U test: p < 0.05 vs. Low Med patients

cMann-Whitney U test: p < 0.05 vs. High Med patients

dMann-Whitney U test: p < 0.05 vs. RTX patients

eMann-Whitney U test: p < 0.05 vs. SS patients