Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 7;7(1):47–57. doi: 10.1007/s41030-020-00142-5

Table 4.

Bioequivalence of fluticasone propionate and salmeterol

Treatmenta AUC0–t (pg h/mL) AUC0–t T/R ratio (90% CI)a Cmax (pg/mL) Cmax T/R ratio (90% CI)b
Study 1: FP/salmeterol 100/50 µg (n = 64)
 Fluticasone propionate
  Test (Wixela) 600.3 1.04 (1.00–1.08) 103.7 0.92 (0.87–0.96)
  Reference (Advair) 576.4 112.9
 Salmeterol
  Test (Wixela) 696.4 1.08 (1.04–1.11) 347.7 1.00 (0.94–1.04)
  Reference (Advair) 644.9 348.3
Study 2: FP/salmeterol 250/50 µg (n = 61)
 Fluticasone propionate
  Test (Wixela) 1251 1.07 (1.02–1.13) 164.2 1.01 (0.95–1.07)
  Reference (Advair) 1164 162.7
 Salmeterol
  Test (Wixela) 641.2 1.03 (0.99–1.07) 296.2 0.93 (0.87–1.00)
  Reference (Advair) 623.3 317.4
Study 3: FP/salmeterol 500/50 µg (n = 65)
 Fluticasone propionate
  Test (Wixela) 2689 0.97 (0.92–1.00) 252.8 0.90 (0.86–0.93)
  Reference (Advair) 2783 281.8
 Salmeterol
  Test (Wixela) 672.3 1.00 (0.96–1.04) 334.9 0.86 (0.81–0.91)
  Reference (Advair) 670.8 388.6

Data presented as natural-log-transformed geometric mean (based on least squares mean)

AUC0–t area under the concentration–time curve from time 0 to the last measurable concentration, CI confidence interval, Cmax maximum plasma concentration, FP fluticasone propionate, R reference product (Advair® Diskus®), S salmeterol, T test product (Wixela® Inhub®)

aThree inhalations were administered in each study, resulting in total FP/S doses of 300/150 µg (study 1), 750/150 µg (study 2), and 1500/150 µg (study 3)

bT and R were bioequivalent if the 90% CIs of the T to R geometric mean ratio were > 0.80 and < 1.25