Skip to main content
. 2021 May 7;8:677626. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.677626

Table 3.

Comparison of first pass success (FPS), intubation attempts, time to intubation, failed intubation, esophageal intubation, and ease of use for each type of bougie.

Flexible tip bougie™ Conventional bougie p-value
No. of intubation attempts 0.024
1 (FPS) 61 (98.4%) 53 (85.5%) 0.008
2 1 (1.6%) 6 (9.7%)
3 0 (0.0%) 3 (4.8%)
Time to intubation, sec 32.0 (23.8–41.3) 41.5 (31.8–69.5) <0.001
Failed intubation 0 (0.0%) 1 (1.6%) NS
Esophageal intubation 0 (0.0%) 5 (8.1%) NS
Ease of use 4.26 (± 0.53) 3.19 (± 0.83) <0.001
Ease of bougie passing hypopharynx 4.47 (± 0.59) 3.48 (± 1.04) <0.001
Ease of ETT passing over bougie 4.56 (± 0.74) 4.08 (± 0.91) 0.002

Data presented as median (interquartile range) or number (percentage) as appropriate.

p < 0.05 is significant, NS, Not statistically significant.