Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 4;16(6):608–620. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsab028

Table 5.

ROI classification accuracy: FHR dataset

FHR Non-FHR Group difference
M [95% CI] accuracy- M [95% CI] accuracy-
above-chance % One-sample t-test above-chance % One-sample t-test Cohen’s d [95% CI] Two-sample t-test
DMPFC 13.8 [2.7, 24.8] t(19) = 1.23, q = 0.022 23.7 [12.0, 35.4] t(18) = 4.26, q < 0.001 0.42 [−0.26, 1.10] t(37) = 1.30, q = 0.339
LTPJ 31.3 [20.6, 41.9] t(19) = 6.14, q < 0.001 36.8 [27.5, 46.1] t(18) = 8.32, q < 0.001 0.26 [−0.39, 0.88] t(37) = 0.83, q = 0.516
PC 25.0 [10.8, 39.2] t(19) = 3.68, q = 0.003 36.8 [27.5, 46.1] t(18) = 8.32, q < 0.001 0.46 [−0.15, 1.03] t(32) = 1.46, q = 0.339
RSTS 17.5 [1.8, 33.2] t(19) = 2.33, q = 0.031 35.5 [25.4, 45.6] t(18) = 7.39, q < 0.001 0.64 [0.01, 1.24] t(32) = 2.02, q = 0.257
RTPJ 30.0 [17.1, 42.9] t(19) = 4.86, q < 0.001 31.6 [19.6, 43.5] t(18) = 5.55, q < 0.001 0.60 [−0.60, 0.70] t(37) = 0.19, q = 0.852