Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 6;41(6):1219–1228. doi: 10.1177/0271678X20958517

Table 5.

Association between ICAS burden and brain volumes and cerebral blood flow.

Model

Total brain volume (ml)b (95% CI)

Total WMHvolume (ml)bb (95% CI)

Periventricular WMH volume (ml)bb (95% CI)

Deep WMH volume (ml)bb (95% CI)

Cerebral blood flow (ml/min)cb (95% CI)

ICASburdena 1 0.34 (−5.05 to 5.73) 0.24 (0.04 to 0.43) 0.31 (0.1 to 0.52) 0.02 (−0.21 to 0.25) −15.62 (−32.97 to 1.72)
2 1.99 (−4.01 to 7.98) 0.24 (0.02 to 0.46) 0.32 (0.08 to 0.56) 0.01 (−0.26 to 0.26) −15.24 (−34.85 to 4.38)
3 2.14 (−3.92 to 8.2) 0.25 (0.03 to 0.48) 0.33 (0.10 to 0.57) 0.01 (−0.26 to 0.27) −12.39 (−31.87 to 7.09)

Values are unstandardized linear regression coefficients (b) with 95% confidence intervals calculated with standard linear regression analysis.

Model 1: adjusted for age and sex. Model 2: model 1 + adjustment for educational level, body mass index, smoking pack-years, alcohol use, diabetes, systolic/diastolic blood pressure, total cholesterol level, total high-density lipoprotein level, use of antihypertensive, lipid-lowering, antiplatelet or oral anticoagulant medication. Model 3: model 2 + adjustment for carotid stenosis ≥50%, carotid intima-media thickness or ankle–brachial index.

aStandardized into Z-score.

bNatural-log transformed.

cAnalyses of cerebral blood flow were additionally adjusted for total brain volume in all models.WMH: white matter hyperintensities.