Skip to main content
. 2021 May 6;23(5):e25131. doi: 10.2196/25131

Table 2.

Characteristics of apps included in the analysis.

Characteristic Apps (n=48), n (%)
Country of development

USA 30 (63)

Germany 4 (8)

Australia 4 (8)

New Zealand 2 (4)

Italy 1 (2)

United Kingdom 1 (2)

Nigeria 1 (2)

China 1 (2)

Switzerland 1 (2)

Japan 1 (2)

Norway 1 (2)

Spain 1 (2)
Setting

Health promotion/prevention 20 (42)

Hospital care 11 (23)

Primary care 8 (17)

Therapeutic or patient education 5 (10)

Primary care and hospital care 3 (6)

Health promotion/prevention and primary care 1 (2)
Medical specialty

Health promotion without a focus on a medical specialty 14 (29)

Cancer 9 (19)

Mental health, psychiatry 6 (13)

Infectious diseases 5 (10)

Cardiovascular diseases, endocrinology (diabetes) 3 (6)

Gynecology, pregnancy 3 (6)

Emergency medicine, intensive care 2 (4)

Addiction medicine 2 (4)

Paramedical specialties (physiotherapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, dietetic, podiatrists) 2 (4)

Pediatrics 1 (2)

Pulmonology 1 (2)
Aim

Facilitating communication between migrant and health provider 16 (33)

Promoting healthy behavior among people who have migrateda 32 (67)

Including adaptation of existing apps 9
Features

Mobile app 38 (79)

Text-messaging service 6 (13)

Mobile app and text-messaging service 2 (4)

Website for consultation 2 (4)
Interactivity

Interactive 31 (65)

Not interactive 17 (35)
Target population

People who have migrated from specific nationalities 24 (50)

Asylum seekers/refugees 4 (8)

People who have migrated at risk from their occupation 3 (6)

Indigenous people 3 (6)

People who have migrated who are concerned by a specific health condition 3 (6)

Other 1 (2)

The app does not specifically target a group of people who have migrated 10 (21)
Languages (in addition to the source language)

1 33 (69)

2-9 9 (19)

10-19 5 (10)

≥20 1 (2)
Fee required

Yes 5 (10)

No 9 (19)

Don't know 34 (71)
Institution funding the development

Public/government 11 (23)

Charitable or crowdfunding 3 (6)

Mix of charitable and public/government 2 (4)

Public/government, private and charitable 1 (2)

Private/industry only 15 (31)

No information about the funding of the app 16 (33)

aOf the 32, 9 were adaptations of existing apps.