Skip to main content
PeerJ logoLink to PeerJ
. 2021 May 18;9:e11304. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11304

Description of three new species of Geometridae (Lepidoptera) using species delimitation in an integrative taxonomy approach for a cryptic species complex

Simeo S Moraes 1,, Ygor Montebello 1, Mariana A Stanton 2, Lydia Fumiko Yamaguchi 2, Massuo J Kato 2, Andr VL Freitas 1
Editor: Daniel Silva
PMCID: PMC8139274  PMID: 34046252

Abstract

The genus Eois Hbner (Geometridae: Larentiinae) comprises 254 valid species, 217 of which were described from the Neotropics and 31 of those having their type locality in Brazil. Since this species rich genus has never been revised, and may potentially include many cryptic undescribed species, Eois embodies a problematic taxonomic scenario. The actual diversity of Eois is greatly underestimated and the Brazilian fauna is poorly known, both because of inadequate sampling and because of the potential existence of cryptic species "hidden" within some nominal taxa. In this study we investigated the diversity within a cryptic species complexes associated to the E. pallidicosta and E. odatis clades. We describe three new species Eois oya Moraes & Montebello sp. nov., Eois ewa Moraes & Stanton sp. nov., and Eois oxum Moraes & Freitas sp. nov., in an integrative taxonomy approach, using morphology, host plant use and species delimitation tools.

Keywords: Dna barcode, Cryptic species, Morphology, Taxonomy, Lepidoptera, Host-plant

Introduction

Geometridae is a megadiverse family with over 24,000 species, being the most species rich lineage in the superfamily Geometroidea and the second most species-rich family among Macroheterocera lineages (Scoble, 1999; Sihvonen et al., 2011; Mitter, Davis & Cummings, 2017). The family Geometridae represents a challenge for researchers because of the taxonomic uncertainties around some species-rich genera, for which taxonomic reviews are lacking and several new taxa await formal descriptions (Strutzenberger et al., 2011; Strutzenberger, Brehm & Fiedler, 2012). Despite the existence of a worldwide catalog (Scoble, 1999), only a small subset of Geometridae genera has been revised (Hulst, 1896; Wehrli, 1939; Rindge, 1990, Pitkin, 2002). Most of these taxonomic studies are restricted to specific geographic areas, leaving the Neotropics as one of the least studied biogeographic regions for the Geometridae fauna.

Eois Hbner belongs to the subfamily Larentiinae and is one of the most species-rich genus, with 254 described species (Brehm et al., 2011), 217 of which were described for the Neotropical region and 31 primary types for Brazil. Species of Eois are small, reaching up to 2 cm in wingspan, and most species present a wing pattern consisting of a yellowish or brown background patterned with reddish or rusty symmetrical bands on both wings. Based on a study with some species from Borneo (Holloway, 1997), the male genitalia lack the uncus and labides, while female genitalia present a robust bursa with multiseriate signa. Recently, Brehm et al. (2011) showed that characters from valvae and vesica on the male genitalia might be phylogenetically informative and also useful in delimiting species.

Notwithstanding Eois being recognized as an important component of the diversity of neotropical moths (Brehm et al., 2011), there is still a large gap in the knowledge and representativeness of the Brazilian fauna. Single-locus species delimitation methods were recognized as a useful approach when working with montane Eois species (Strutzenberger et al., 2011) and recently this diversity was also increased for lowland species (Moraes et al., 2021). However, despite the use of molecular methods for species-delimitation having proven to be extremely valuable in highlighting cryptic diversity, fewer than 30% of the studies on species delimitation made taxonomic recommendations and only 25% described new species (Carstens et al., 2013).

In the present study we contribute to the knowledge of Eois diversity using an integrative taxonomic approach on cryptic species complexes, and describe three new species of Eois. Accordingly, we accessed the molecular diversity and used the Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery method (ABGD) for species delimitation (Puillandre et al., 2012). To test the validity of the molecular taxonomic units (MOTUs) we studied morphological characters for wing pattern and genitalia, as well as host plant use by larvae. We expect that these practices will improve the number of new taxa described in cryptic complexes, increasing the knowledge on the real diversity of Eois from Brazil.

Materials and Methods

Sampling

Immature stages and imagos of Eois were obtained from six localities: (i) Serra do Japi Biological Reserve (23 14 S 46 58 W), Jundia, So Paulo, Brazil; (ii) Boraceia Biological Station (23 39 S 45 54 W), Salespolis, So Paulo, Brazil; (iii) Intervales State Park (24 16 S 48 24 W), Ribeiro Grande, So Paulo, Brazil, (iv) Itatiaia National Park (22 27 S 44 37 W), Itatiaia, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, (v) Serra dos Orgos National Park (22 27 S 42 59 W), Terespolis, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, and (vi) Adolpho Ducke Forest Reserve (2 57 S 59 55 W), Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.

Imagos were collected during the night using a light source consisting of a a 500 W mix bulb on a square white sheet (2 m side). Immatures were collected by searching plants of the genus Piper L. and Peperomia Ruiz & Pav.(Piperaceae), known larval host plants of several species of Eois, and were reared in the laboratory. Samples of the host plant, including leaves, inflorescence and fruits, were also collected for further identification. Permits for field trips were issued by Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservao da Biodiversidade (ICMBio, permit nos. 10362-1, 15780-10 and 22205-6). All new described species are registered in the SISGEN (A4ED092).

Rearing methods

Larvae were reared in individual 300 mL clear plastic vials with lids, and provided with leaves of the same Piper and Peperomia plants on which they were collected (Moraes, Otero & Freitas, 2017). Pupae were transferred to individual 50 mL clear plastic vials with lids and moist cotton wool until emergence. Larvae and pupae were maintained under constant temperature (25 C) and 12 h light: 12 h dark cycle. After emergence, imagos were sacrificed for DNA extraction and genitalia dissection. Samples of the host plants were collected and compared to previously identified samples from the same locality made at the Laboratrio de Qumica de Produtos Naturais, at the University of So Paulo, and compared to the species description in the Brazilian Flora 2020 project (Guimares, Queiroz & Medeiros, 2020).

DNA extraction and PCR conditions

Three legs were removed from each specimen shortly after collection and before spreading. Sampled legs were preserved dry and stored in 1.5 mL tubes at 20 C. Total genomic DNA was extracted with DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Venlo, Netherlands), according to the manufacturers protocol with final elution in 100 l elution buffer. The 5 end (barcode region) of the mitochondrial gene cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI, 650 bp) was amplified using the primers HCO and LCO (Folmer et al., 1994) containing the T3 and T7 promotor universal tails, respectively (Wahlberg & Wheat, 2008). Polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) were performed with 13 l total volume containing 12 l of extracted DNA, 3.24.2 l of H2O milli-Q, 6.5 l of 2x MyTaq HS red mix (Bioline Co., London, UK), and 0.65 l of each primer (10 mM). PCR products were amplified as follows: 96 C for 7 min, followed by 40 cycles of 96 C for 30 s, 50 C for 30 s and 72 C for 90 s, and a final extension period of 72 C for 10 min.

Amplicons were purified adding a mix of 1.3 l of FastAP Thermosensitive Alkaline Phosphatase (Thermofisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and 0.7 l of Exonuclease 1 (Thermofisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) to 10 l of PCR products. Purified products were sent for Sanger sequencing.

Alignment, tree inference and species delimitation

The genetic dataset consisted of 160 newly sequenced individuals of 18 putative species combined with 36 sequences obtained from Genbank (Table 1). Sequences were aligned using MAFFT (Katoh et al., 2002) implemented in Geneious v.11.0.2 (Kearse et al., 2012). The alignments were carefully checked by eye, taking into consideration the reading frame relative to the reference sequence. The Maximum Likelihood analyses were conducted using RAxML-HPC2 V.8.2.10 (Stamatakis, 2014) on the webserver CIPRES Science Gateway (Miller, Pfeiffer & Schwartz, 2010). Support for nodes was evaluated with 1000 ultrafast bootstrap (UFBoot2) approximations (Hoang et al., 2018), UFBoot2 values 95 indicate well-supported clades.

Table 1. List of specimens vouchered, the associated clade, geographical localities, host plant and herbarium voucher for host plants used in this study.

GenBank Voucher Clade Locality Host Plant Herbarium Voucher
LEPSM818
LEPSM609
K2422-1 olivacea Brazil, MS, Aquidauana Piper tuberculatum Jacq. K2422
K2422-1a olivacea Brazil, MS, Aquidauana Piper tuberculatum Jacq. K2422
K2426-2 olivacea Brazil, MS, Aquidauana Piper tuberculatum Jacq. K2422
K2426-3 olivacea Brazil, MS, Aquidauana Piper tuberculatum Jacq. K2422
M097-1 russearia Brazil, SP, Mogi-Guau, Reserva Biolgica de Mogi-Guau Piper arboreum Aubl. K1953*
Mogi#906 russearia Brazil, SP, Mogi-Guau, Reserva Biolgica de Mogi-Guau Piper arboreum Aubl. K1953*
M081-1 russearia Brazil, SP, Mogi-Guau, Reserva Biolgica de Mogi-Guau Piper crassinervium Kunth. K1954*
Mogi#802 russearia Brazil, SP, Mogi-Guau, Reserva Biolgica de Mogi-Guau Piper crassinervium Kunth. K1954*
M076-1 russearia Brazil, SP, Mogi-Guau, Reserva Biolgica de Mogi-Guau Piper crassinervium Kunth. K1954*
M081-2 russearia Brazil, SP, Mogi-Guau, Reserva Biolgica de Mogi-Guau Piper crassinervium Kunth. K1954*
Mogi#818 russearia Brazil, SP, Mogi-Guau, Reserva Biolgica de Mogi-Guau Piper crassinervium Kunth. K1954*
K2411-2 russearia Brazil, MS, Aquidauana Piper sp 2 K2417
K2417-12 russearia Brazil, MS, Aquidauana Piper sp 2 K2417
K2417-7 russearia Brazil, MS, Aquidauana Piper sp 2 K2417
K2417-27 russearia Brazil, MS, Aquidauana Piper sp 2 K2417
K2416-16 russearia Brazil, MS, Aquidauana Piper sp 2 K2417
LEPSM906 adimaria
LEPSM907 adimaria
K2206-1 odatis Brazil, SP, Jundia, Reserva Biolgica da Serra do Japi Piper lindbergii C.DC K2493
K2325-15 odatis Brazil, SP, Jundia, Reserva Biolgica da Serra do Japi Piper lindbergii C.DC K2493
K2325-9 odatis Brazil, SP, Jundia, Reserva Biolgica da Serra do Japi Piper lindbergii C.DC K2493
K2325-16 odatis Brazil, SP, Jundia, Reserva Biolgica da Serra do Japi Piper lindbergii C.DC K2493
K2325-10 odatis Brazil, SP, Jundia, Reserva Biolgica da Serra do Japi Piper lindbergii C.DC K2493
K2206-23 odatis Brazil, SP, Jundia, Reserva Biolgica da Serra do Japi Piper lindbergii C.DC K2493
M768-1 odatis Brazil, SP, Jundia, Reserva Biolgica da Serra do Japi Piper lindbergii C.DC M1033
M528-4 odatis Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Piper amplumKunth. M1033
M528-1 odatis Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Piper amplum Kunth. M1033
LEPSM909 odatis
K2325-2 odatis Brazil, SP, Jundia, Reserva Biolgica da Serra do Japi Piper lindbergii C.DC K2493
K2452-1 odatis Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Peperomia hispidula (Sw.) A. Dietr. K1612*
K2452-4 odatis Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Peperomia hispidula (Sw.) A. Dietr. K1612*
K2452-5 odatis Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Peperomia hispidula (Sw.) A. Dietr. K1612*
K2452-2 odatis Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Peperomia hispidula (Sw.) A. Dietr. K1612*
M624-1 odatis Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Piper malacophyllum C. Presl M1038
M289-1 odatis Brazil, SP, So Paulo, Parque Estadual do Jaragu Piper malacophyllum C. Presl K2294*
#107 odatis
M621-1 odatis Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Piper malacophyllum C. Presl M1038
M436-1 odatis Brazil, SP, So Paulo, Parque Estadual do Jaragu Piper malacophyllum C. Presl K2294*
K2159-7 odatis Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Piper malacophyllum C. Presl K2159
M576-1 odatis Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Piper malacophyllum C. Presl M1038
M657-1 odatis Brazil, SP, So Paulo, Parque Estadual do Jaragu Piper gaudichaudianum Kunth. K2311*
M435-1 odatis Brazil, SP, So Paulo, Parque Estadual do Jaragu Piper malacophyllum C. Presl K2294*
M622-1 odatis Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Piper malacophyllum C. Presl M1038
M388-1 odatis Brazil, SP, So Paulo, Parque Estadual do Jaragu Piper gaudichaudianum Kunth. K2311*
K2157-2 odatis Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Piper malacophyllum C. Presl K2165
PPU721 odatis Brazil, SP, Jundia, Reserva Biolgica da Serra do Japi Piper malacophyllum C. Presl K2306
M761-1 odatis Brazil, SP, Jundia, Reserva Biolgica da Serra do Japi Piper gaudichaudianum Kunth. K2198*
M754-1 odatis Brazil, SP, Jundia, Reserva Biolgica da Serra do Japi Piper gaudichaudianum Kunth. K2198*
PPU660 odatis Brazil, SP, Jundia, Reserva Biolgica da Serra do Japi Piper malacophyllum C. Presl K2306
M358-1 odatis Brazil, SP, So Paulo, Parque Estadual do Jaragu Piper cubataonum C. DC K1951*
M775-1 odatis Brazil, SP, Jundia, Reserva Biolgica da Serra do Japi Piper gaudichaudianum Kunth. K2198*
M678-1 odatis Brazil, SP, So Paulo, Parque Estadual do Jaragu Piper malacophyllum C. Presl K2294*
M677-1 odatis Brazil, SP, So Paulo, Parque Estadual do Jaragu Piper gaudichaudianum Kunth. K2311*
K2165-3 odatis Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Piper malacophyllum C. Presl K2165
M514-1 odatis Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Piper crassinervium Kunth. K1954*
K2423-5 odatis Brazil, MS, Corumb Piper amalago L. K2421
K2423-4 odatis Brazil, MS, Corumb Piper amalago L. K2421
K2423-8 odatis Brazil, MS, Corumb Piper amalago L. K2421
K2423-3 odatis Brazil, MS, Corumb Piper amalago L. K2421
K2212-11 odatis Brazil, SP, Jundia, Reserva Biolgica da Serra do Japi Piper malacophyllum C. Presl K2212
M616-1 odatis Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Piper chimonanthifolium Kunth. K1960*
M399-1 odatis Brazil, SP, So Paulo, Parque Estadual do Jaragu Piper malacophyllum C. Presl K2294*
#359 odatis
M731-1 odatis Brazil, SP, Jundia, Reserva Biolgica da Serra do Japi Piper chimonanthifolium Kunth. K1960*
K2454-38 odatis Brazil, SP, Campos do Jordo Piper gaudichaudianum Kunth. K2446
K2454-31 odatis Brazil, SP, Campos do Jordo Piper gaudichaudianum Kunth. K2446
K2446-7 odatis Brazil, SP, Campos do Jordo Piper gaudichaudianum Kunth. K2446
K2454-47 odatis Brazil, SP, Campos do Jordo Piper gaudichaudianum Kunth. K2446
K2453-47 odatis Brazil, SP, Campos do Jordo Piper gaudichaudianum Kunth. K2446
K2165-5 odatis Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Piper malacophyllum C. Presl K2165
M611-1 odatis Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Piper chimonanthifolium Kunth. K1960*
#845 odatis Brazil, SP, Mogi-Guau, Reserva Biolgica de Mogi-Guau Piper gaudichaudianum Kunth.
#855 odatis Brazil, SP, Mogi-Guau, Reserva Biolgica de Mogi-Guau Piper gaudichaudianum Kunth.
#841 odatis Brazil, SP, Mogi-Guau, Reserva Biolgica de Mogi-Guau Piper gaudichaudianum Kunth.
PPU651 odatis Brazil, SP, Jundia, Reserva Biolgica da Serra do Japi Piper hillianum C. DC. K1920*
M844-2 odatis Brazil, SP, Capo Bonito, Parque Estadual Intervales Piper gaudichaudianum Kunth. M1034
M617-1 odatis Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Piper chimonanthifolium Kunth. K1960*
M735-1 odatis Brazil, SP, Jundia, Reserva Biolgica da Serra do Japi Piper chimonanthifolium Kunth. K2495
M738-1 odatis Brazil, SP, Jundia, Reserva Biolgica da Serra do Japi Piper chimonanthifolium Kunth. K2495
M618-1 odatis Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Piper chimonanthifolium Kunth. K1960*
M573-1-4 odatis Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Piper chimonanthifolium Kunth. K1960*
M573-1-3 odatis Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Piper chimonanthifolium Kunth. K1960*
K2453-4-1 odatis Brazil, SP, Campos do Jordo Piper gaudichaudianum Kunth. K2446
M573-1-5 odatis Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Piper chimonanthifolium Kunth. K1960*
M163-1-1 odatis Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Piper chimonanthifolium Kunth. K1960*
K2453-4b odatis Brazil, SP, Campos do Jordo Piper gaudichaudianum Kunth. K2446
K2453-4-2 odatis Brazil, SP, Campos do Jordo Piper gaudichaudianum Kunth. K2446
K2453-4 odatis Brazil, SP, Campos do Jordo Piper gaudichaudianum Kunth. K2446
M573-1-2 odatis Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Piper chimonanthifolium Kunth. K1960*
K2453-4-3 odatis Brazil, SP, Campos do Jordo Piper gaudichaudianum Kunth. K2446
LEPSM920
#25
M022-1 veniliata Brazil, SP, So Paulo, Parque Estadual do Jaragu Piper gaudichaudianum Kunth. K2494*
M286-1 veniliata Brazil, SP, So Paulo, Parque Estadual do Jaragu Piper gaudichaudianum Kunth. K2494*
K2326-1 veniliata Brazil, SP, Jundia, Reserva Biolgica da Serra do Japi Piper gaudichaudianum Kunth. K2494*
K2322-1 hyperythraria Brazil, SP, Jundia, Reserva Biolgica da Serra do Japi Piper arboreum Aubl. K1953*
M522-3 hyperythraria Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Piper cernuum Vell. K1925*
K2322-5 hyperythraria Brazil, SP, Jundia, Reserva Biolgica da Serra do Japi Piper arboreum Aubl. K1953*
LEPSM1094 hyperythraria
K2322-17 hyperythraria Brazil, SP, Jundia, Reserva Biolgica da Serra do Japi Piper arboreum Aubl. K1953*
#798 hyperythraria Brazil, SP, Mogi-Guau, Reserva Biolgica de Mogi-Guau Piper arboreum Aubl. K1953*
M589-3 hyperythraria Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Piper arboreum Aubl. K1953*
M644-2a hyperythraria Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Piper arboreum Aubl. K1953*
M591-1 hyperythraria Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Piper truncatum Vell. K1950*
LEPSM901 hyperythraria
K2366-1 olivacea Brazil, SP, Capo Bonito, Parque Estadual Intervales Piper aduncum L. K2387
K2369-1 olivacea Brazil, SP, Capo Bonito, Parque Estadual Intervales Piper aduncum L. K2387
K2369-3 olivacea Brazil, SP, Capo Bonito, Parque Estadual Intervales Piper aduncum L. K2387
M523-2 olivacea Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Piper cernuum Vell. K1925*
LEPSM615 olivacea
M527-4 olivacea Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Piper cernuum Vell. K1925*
M572-2 olivacea Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Piper cernuum Vell. K1925*
LEPSM618 olivacea
M516-1 olivacea Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Piper crassinervium Kunth. K1954*
K2423-2 olivacea Brazil, MS, Corumb Piper amalago L. K2423
M544-1 olivacea Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Piper crassinervium Kunth. K1954*
K2367-3 olivacea Brazil, SP, Capo Bonito, Parque Estadual Intervales Piper crassinervium Kunth. K1954*
K2372-10 olivacea Brazil, SP, Capo Bonito, Parque Estadual Intervales Piper crassinervium Kunth. K1954*
K2367-5 olivacea Brazil, SP, Capo Bonito, Parque Estadual Intervales Piper crassinervium Kunth. K1954*
K2322-2 olivacea Brazil, SP, Jundia, Reserva Biolgica da Serra do Japi Piper arboreum Aubl. K1953*
K2372-6 olivacea Brazil, SP, Capo Bonito, Parque Estadual de Intervales Piper crassinervium Kunth. K1954*
K2372-8 olivacea Brazil, SP, Capo Bonito, Parque Estadual Intervales Piper crassinervium Kunth. K1954*
#862 olivacea Brazil, SP, Mogi-Guau, Reserva Biolgica de Mogi-Guau Piper crassinervium Kunth.
M551-2 olivacea Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Piper crassinervium Kunth. K1954*
M548-1 olivacea Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Piper crassinervium Kunth. K1954*
M626-1 olivacea Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Piper crassinervium Kunth. K1954*
M593-1 olivacea Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Piper cf. tectoniifolium Kunth. K1958*
K1228-2 olivacea Colombia, Bogota Piper bogotense C. DC.
JQ424371.1 pallidicosta
JQ424372.1 pallidicosta
K1228-1 pallidicosta Colombia, Bogota Piper bogotense C. DC.
JQ179873.1 pallidicosta
JF859258.1 pallidicosta
JQ424375.1 pallidicosta
GQ433544.1 pallidicosta
KU381316.1 pallidicosta
JQ179915.1 pallidicosta
MG572804.1 pallidicosta
JQ179875.1 pallidicosta
JQ179870.1 pallidicosta
KU381055.1 pallidicosta
HQ576249.1 pallidicosta
MG572805.1 pallidicosta
JX150931.1 pallidicosta
KU381753.1 pallidicosta
JX150863.1 pallidicosta
GQ433565 pallidicosta
GQ433565.1 pallidicosta
JQ179924.1 pallidicosta
MG572814.1 pallidicosta
JQ179903.1 pallidicosta
JQ179880.1 pallidicosta
GQ433564.1 pallidicosta
JQ424379.1 pallidicosta
JQ424374.1 pallidicosta
M157-3 pallidicosta Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Piper reitzii Yunck. M157
LEPSM922 pallidicosta
M156-5 pallidicosta Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Piper reitzii Yunck. M156
M155-12 pallidicosta Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Piper reitzii Yunck. M158
M155-3 pallidicosta Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Piper reitzii Yunck. M158
JQ179895.1 pallidicosta
JQ179923.1 pallidicosta
JQ179901.1 pallidicosta
JQ179902.1 pallidicosta
JQ179905.1 pallidicosta
JQ179906.1 pallidicosta
GQ433557.1 pallidicosta
JQ179891.1 pallidicosta
JQ179941.1 pallidicosta
M594-1 olivacea Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Piper cubataonum C DC. K1951*
M357-2 olivacea Brazil, SP, So Paulo, Parque Estadual do Jaragu Piper cubataonum C DC. K1951*
M595-1 olivacea Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Piper cubataonum C DC. K1951*
M594-2 olivacea Brazil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia Piper cubataonum C DC. K1951*
K2420-27 russearia Brazil, MS, Aquidauana Piper sp 1 K2420
K2420-3 russearia Brazil, MS, Aquidauana Piper sp 1 K2420
K2420-21 russearia Brazil, MS, Aquidauana Piper sp 1 K2420
K2420-a russearia Brazil, MS, Aquidauana Piper sp 1 K2420
TMD2018#4 russearia Brazil, AM, Manaus, Reserva Florestal Adolpho Ducke Piper erectipilum Yunck. M1041
TMD2018#5 russearia Brazil, AM, Manaus, Reserva Florestal Adolpho Ducke Piper erectipilum Yunck. M1041
TMD2018#6 russearia Brazil, AM, Manaus, Reserva Florestal Adolpho Ducke Piper erectipilum Yunck. M1041
TMD2018#9 russearia Brazil, AM, Manaus, Reserva Florestal Adolpho Ducke Piper erectipilum Yunck. M1041
TMD2018#12 russearia Brazil, AM, Manaus, Reserva Florestal Adolpho Ducke Piper erectipilum Yunck. M1041
TMD2018#20 russearia Brazil, AM, Manaus, Reserva Florestal Adolpho Ducke Piper erectipilum Yunck. M1041

Note:

Herbarium specimens that were identified by comparison to previously collected samples deposited at the University of So Paulo Herbarium (SPF) are reported with (*).

In order to study the species boundaries within our dataset, we used a species delimitation method focused on single-locus gene analysis: The Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery (ABGD, Puillandre et al., 2012). This method appeared to be more congruent with the Eois morphology compared to other methods (mPTP and bPTP) (Moraes et al., 2021). The ABGD method seeks to quantify a range of the barcode gap that separates intra from interspecific distances, automatically clustering sequences into candidate species based on pairwise distances (Puillandre et al., 2012). Default settings were used for the prior range for maximum intraspecific divergence (0.001, 0.1). Results were compared using Jukes-Cantor (JC69) corrected distances and relative gap width of 1.0. ABGD analyses were performed using the graphic web version (https://bioinfo.mnhn.fr/abi/public/abgd/).

Morphological study

The external morphology and color pattern were analyzed following the usual protocols (Winter, 2000). Wing venation and pattern were recorded and genitalia of females and males were dissected. For interpretation and descriptions of genital structures we followed the procedures outlined in Moraes & Duarte (2009), based on classical studies on Lepidoptera morphology (male genitalia in Pierce, 1909, Sibatani et al., 1954; Okagaki et al., 1955; Klots, 1956; Ogata et al., 1957; Birket-Smith, 1974; female genitalia in Pierce, 1914; Klots, 1956; Mutuura, 1972; Galicia, Snchez & Cordeiro, 2008).

A total of 11 specimens belonging to the three new species here described were examined. Characters of wing venation, color pattern, and male and female genitalia were analyzed. The genitalia were illustrated with a camera lucida attached to a stereomicroscope.

Acronyms for the collections are: MZUSPMuseu de Zoologia da Universidade de So Paulo, So Paulo, So Paulo, Brazil; ZUECZoological Collection of the Museu da Biodiversidade da Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, So Paulo, Brazil.

The electronic version of this article in Portable Document Format (PDF) will represent a published work according to the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN), and hence the new names contained in the electronic version are effectively published under that Code from the electronic edition alone. This published work and the nomenclatural acts it contains have been registered in ZooBank, the online registration system for the ICZN. The ZooBank LSIDs (Life Science Identifiers) can be resolved and the associated information viewed through any standard web browser by appending the LSID to the prefix http://zoobank.org/. The LSID for this publication is: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9450BCDC-7EB9-4CA6-BC76-04324F81ACA4. The online version of this work is archived and available from the following digital repositories: PeerJ, PubMed Central and CLOCKSS.

Results

Based on the present taxonomic sampling, the ML tree appeared divided into 10 main clades named after representative species names in each clade (Fig. 1), following Strutzenberger et al. (2017). From all defined MOTUs, three of them were identified as undescribed species based on present molecular results and also on available morphological evidence, and are here described. All but one species of Eois were reared on species of Piper and the host plant species in which larvae of each MOTU were collected are shown, when available (Fig. 1). The ABGD method used for delimiting species recovered each of new species here described as a distinct molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTUs).

Figure 1. Gene tree for COI-begin marker.

Figure 1

Colored leaves represent host plants for clades where adult representatives were obtained from reared immatures. Numbers on the node represent bootstrap stability equal or above 96%. Photographs by Simeo Moraes and Mariana Stanton.

The first undescribed species was identified in the larger clade named pallidicosta clade (after Eois pallidicosta (Warren, 1907)); the high UFBoot2 support values and the long branch length (related to a genetic distance higher than 3% from all other species in the clade) suggested that this is a distinct evolutionary lineage (Fig. 1).

The second undescribed species was identified in the odatis clade (named after Eois odatis (Druce, 1892)). In this clade, one MOTU was recovered based on four specimens forming a well supported clade that stands out by using Peperomia hispidula (Sw.) A.Dietr. (Piperaceae) as larval host plant.

The third undescribed species is part of the hyperythraria clade (named after Eois hyperythraria (Guene, 1858)) and is represented by a single individual collected a light source in a high montane area in Southeastern Brazil. Despite having returned to the sampling site several times no additional individuals were collected. Even though, its idiosyncratic wing pattern and the morphology of genitalia justifies the description of this new taxa based only on the holotype.

Species Description

Eois oya Moraes & Montebello sp.nov. (Figs. 2A2B, 3)

Figure 2. Habitus of Eois holotype specimens.

Figure 2

AB. Male, holotype of Eois oya sp.nov. A. Dorsal view. B. Ventral view. CD. Male, holotype of Eois ewa sp.nov. C., Dorsal view. D. Ventral view. EF. Female, holotype of Eois oxum sp.nov. Scale bar 1 cm. Photographs by Simeo Moraes.

Figure 3. Male and female genitalia of Eois oya sp.nov. paratype.

Figure 3

A. Male genitalia, genital capsule, dorsal view. B. Male genitalia, genital capsule, ventral view C. Male genitalia, genital capsule, lateral view. D. Male genitalia, aedeagus, lateral view. E. Female genitalia, dorsal view. Line drawings by Simeo Moraes and Ygor Montebello

Diagnosis ( and ). Forewing dorsal view with a horizontal black stripe on the trunk of Cu vein, from the base of wing reaching the outer margin. Forewing and hindwing with a black dot on the discal cell closure. Aedeagus with a pointed spine close to vesica, vesica bilobed with spiniform cornuti (Fig. 3D).

Description () (Figs. 2A2B). Head: Light brown. Frons light brown, vertex light brown. Labial palp light brown. Thorax: Predominantly light brown. Prothoracic collar with iridescent gold scales. Tegulae light brown. Forewing background light brown, darker proximally; horizontal black stripe on the trunk of Cu vein, from the base of wing reaching the outer margin; one black dot on the discal cell closure; two vertical, mirrored stripes beyond discal cell closure, from costal margin to inner margin; submarginal band as a faint stripe; marginal band following the outer margin contour; underside with the same dorsal pattern. Hindwing with the same forewing pattern, except being lighter proximally and without the submarginal stripe. Abdomen. Dorsally brown; ventrally light brown with two lateral dark brown stripes. Genitalia (Figs. 3A3D): Tegumen triangular in dorsal view, with the anterior margin round. Uncus absent. Valva entitre, sub-elliptical; sacculus developed, consisting of an anterior projection with rounded apex. Labides absent. Fultura inferior or juxta sclerotized, shaped like an inverted U. Saccus with a short anterior projection. Subscaphium smooth. Aedeagus rectilinear with a spine near the vesica; ejaculatory bulb rounded, foramen lateral; vesica bilobed, lobes with dense sclerotized spiniform cornuti.

Description () Head: Same as in the male except for the antenna less pectinated. Thorax: Same as in the male. Abdomen: Same as in the male. Genitalia (Fig. 3E): Seventh sternite smooth; ostium membranous not fused with the seventh sternite; antrum short and membranous, except for a sclerotized bracket-shaped support close to corpus bursae; ductus bursae short and membranous; corpus bursae extending beyond the seventh sternite; signa consisting of several microspicles and a falciform spine. Bulla seminallis arising from a ventral pouch on the posterior portion of corpus bursae. Lamella antevaginalis and postvaginalis absent.

Etymology. The specific epithet, oya is the Brazilian name for the female orisha who commands the winds, lightning and storms. In the native culture of the Yoruba people, orishas represent spirits sent for the guidance of all creation and of humanity.

The Portuguese spelling comes from the Yoruba ya which means she tore. She is the patron of the Niger River, known to the Yoruba as the Odo-ya. The specific epithet is a tribute to women and to Brazilian black culture. A noun in apposition.

Distribution. The few records for this species are from medium and low altitudes (800 m to 1,200 m a.s.l.) in the Serra do Mar and Serra da Mantiqueira mountain chains, in a narrow region of the Atlantic Forest near the border between the states of So Paulo and Rio de Janeiro.

Remarks: Some adults were obtained from immature stages hand-collected on Piper reitzii plants at the Parque Nacional do Itatiaia, in the state of Rio de Janeiro and reared to adults in laboratory (see Methods section).

Type series. HOLOTYPE , ex larva: BRAZIL: Rio de Janeiro: Itatiaia:, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia 22 27 01.5 S 44 37 14.0 W, 1,174 m asl, 03-VIII-2016, Simeo M., Tamara A. & Mariana S leg. Deposited in the Zoological Collection of the Museu da Biodiversidade da Universidade Estadual de Campinas (ZUEC), Campinas, So Paulo, Brazil.

PARATYPES (all from Brazil): Rio de Janeiro: Itatiaia, 1 and 2 , ex larva, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia, 22 27 01.5 S 44 37 14.0 W, 1,174 m asl, 03-VIII-2016, Simeo M., Tamara A. & Mariana S. leg. (ZUEC). So Paulo: Salespolis, 1 and 1, Estao Biolgica de Boraceia, 23 39S 45 54W, 850 m asl, 28-X/ 01-XI-2016, Simeo M., Tamara A. & Andr T leg. (MZUSP).

Eois ewa Moraes & Stanton sp.nov. (Figs. 2C2D, 4)

Figure 4. Male and female genitalia of Eois ewa sp.nov. paratype.

Figure 4

A. Male genitalia, genital capsule, dorsal view. B. Male genitalia, genital capsule, ventral view C. Male genitalia, genital capsule, lateral view. D. Male genitalia, aedeagus, lateral view. E. Female genitalia, lateral view. Line drawings by Simeo Moraes.

Diagnosis ( and ). Forewing dorsal view with dark brown maculae on the outer margin. Forewings and hindwings with two vertical mirrored bands on discal cell closure, continuous with dorsally dark brown abdominal segments A5 and A6 (Fig. 2C).

Description () (Figs. 2C2D). Head: Brown. Frons brown, vertex brown. Labial palp light brown. Thorax: Predominantly light brown. Prothoracic collar with iridescent gold scales. Tegulae light brown. Forewing background rusty brown; two sinuous black stripes on the wing base, from de trunk of R vein, reaching the inner margin; two vertical mirrored bands on discal cell closure, from the trunk of R4+R5 to inner margin; dark brown maculae on the outer margin, merged with the discal bands in the region of discal cell closure; underside with the same dorsal pattern. Hindwing with the same forewing pattern, except with the light brown background and the outer maculae replaced by three bands composed of brown spots. Abdomen: Dorsally brown; dark brown central macula on abdominal tergites A1-A4, abdominal tergites A5-A6 dark brown; ventrally light brown with patches of dark brown scales on the sternite A2-A8 margin. Genitalia (Figs. 4A4D): Tegumen triangular in dorsal view, with the anterior margin round. Uncus absent. Valva trapezoidal; sacculus developed, consisting of an anterior projection with rounded apex. Labides absent. Transtila sclerotized, squared. Fultura inferior or juxta sclerotized, shaped like a U. Saccus with a short anterior projection. Aedeagus rectilinear and smooth; ejaculatory bulb rounded, foramen lateral; vesica bilobed, lobes with two patches of sclerotized spiniform cornuti.

Description (). Head: Same as in the male except for the antenna less pectinated. Thorax: Same as in the male. Abdomen: Same as in the male. Genitalia (Fig. 4E): Seventh sternite smooth; ostium membranous not fused with the seventh sternite; antrum short and membranous, except for a sclerotized ring close to corpus bursae; ductus bursae short and membranous; corpus bursae with multiseriated signa, signa consisting of several microspicles displaced at the anterior portion of corpus bursae. Accessory bag smooth. Lamella antevaginalis and postvaginalis absent.

Etymology. The specific epithet, ewa comes from Yoruba Yew. In Brazil, ewa is name for the female orisha and river deity from the Yew river, located in the ancient Egbado tribe (present-day city of Yewa). In the native culture of the Yoruba people, orishas represent spirits sent for the guidance of all creation and of humanity.

Ewa represents the gift of divination and intuition. She also represents the mutations, transformations and the perception of what is beautiful and what is ugly. The specific epithet is a tribute to women and to Brazilian black culture. A noun in apposition.

Distribution. The four individuals known were obtained from reared larvae collected on the host plant Peperomia hispidula in humid montane forests (altitude of 1,100 m a.s.l.) at the Itatiaia National Park, in the state of Rio de Janeiro.

Type series. HOLOTYPE , ex larva: Rio de Janeiro: Itatiaia: Parque Nacional do Itatiaia, 22 25 37.8 S 44 37 07.0 W, 1,100 m asl, 30-VI-2017, Lydia Y., Mariana S. & Simeo M. leg. Deposited in the Zoological collection of the Museu da Biodiversidade da Universidade Estadual de Campinas (ZUEC), Campinas, So Paulo, Brazil.

PARATYPES (all from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil): Itatiaia: 2 and 4, ex larva, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia, 22 25 37.8 S 44 37 07.0 W, 1,100 m asl, 30-VI-2017, Lydia Y., Mariana S. & Simeo M. leg. (ZUEC); 1, ex larva: 30-VI-2017, Lydia Y., Mariana S. & Simeo M. leg. (MZUSP).

Eois oxum Moraes & Freitas sp.nov. (Figs. 2E2F, 5)

Figure 5. Female genitalia of Eois oxum sp.nov. holotype.

Figure 5

A. Genitalia, dorsal view. B. Genitalia, ventral view C. Genitalia, lateral view. Line drawings by Simeo Moraes

Diagnosis (). Forewing costal margin brown, olive green at the wing base and apex, in dorsal view. Hindwing upperside olive green at the wing base. Forewing and hindwing with a black dot on the center of discal cell. Abdominal segments A1 and A2 olive green dorsally (Fig. 2E).

Description () (Figs. 2E2F). Head: Brown. Frons brown, vertex brown. Labial palp light brown. Thorax: Predominantly olive green. Prothorax brown and prothoracic collar olive green. Tegulae olive green. Forewing background olive green, costal margin brown; a black dot in the center of discal cell; two vertical mirrored dark brown stripes in the discal cell closure, from costal margin to inner margin; two post discal bands, faint from costal margin to R5, dark brown from R5 to inner margin; dark brown maculae on the tornus region, merged with the post discal bands on the region close to tornus; outer margin delineated by rusty brown scales followed by a fringe of yellow scales; underside with the same dorsal pattern but with light brown background and rusty brown bands. Hindwing with the same forewing pattern, except for the darker apex and the delineated post discal bands. Abdomen: Dorsally olive green on segments A1-A2, beige on segments A3-A7, ventrally beige. Genitalia (Fig. 5): Seventh sternite smooth; ostium sclerotized not fused with the seventh sternite; antrum short and membranous, except for a sclerotized ring close to corpus bursae; ductus bursae short and membranous; corpus bursae extending beyond the seventh sternite, signa consisting of several microspicles and a falciform spine. Bulla seminallis arising from a ventral pouch on the posterior portion of corpus bursae Lamella antevaginalis absent. Lamella postvaginalis sclerotized, square shaped.

Etymology. The specific epithet oxum comes from Yoruba Osun. It is the Brazilian name of the female orisha and river deity who reigns over fresh waters. In the native culture of the Yoruba people, orishas represent spirits sent for the guidance of all creation and of humanity.

Oxum is considered the lady of beauty, fertility, money and sensitivity. Its name derives from the Osun River, which flows in Yorubaland, the Nigerian region of js. The specific epithet is a tribute to women and to Brazilian black culture. A noun in apposition.

Distribution. The single record came from a site of montane rainforest in a region with elevations ranging from 800 m to 1,000 m a.s.l. in the Serra do Mar mountain chain, in So Paulo State.

Remarks: Eois oxum is represented by a singleton collected on a lightrap. Despite having returned to the sampling site several times no additional individuals were collected. Regardless of having just one specimen available, the idiosyncratic wing pattern and the morphology of genilalia justifies the description of this new taxon based only on the holotype.

Type series. HOLOTYPE : BRAZIL: So Paulo: Salespolis, Estao Biolgica de Boraceia, 23 39 S 45 54 W, 850 m asl, 28-X/ 01-XI-2016, Simeo M., Tamara A. & Andr T leg. Deposited in the Zoology Collection of the Museu da Biodiversidade da Universidade Estadual de Campinas (ZUEC), Campinas, So Paulo, Brazil.

Discussion

Although the diversity of Eois has been highlighted in previous studies based on molecular evidence (Strutzenberger et al., 2011; Wilson et al., 2012; Moraes et al., 2021), the lack of researchers working on this diversity and providing stability for the names through formal description of new taxa precluded a comprehensive taxonomic treatment so that the proper description of this huge diversity remains a taxonomic challenge.

In the present study, we provided a preliminary taxonomic assessment for a small clade of Eois; a broader taxonomic sampling and additional evidence (molecular and morphological) will be needed to deal with larges clades, such as those of E. olivacea and E. tegularia. In short, although the present study is a small contribution for a clade that is clearly composed of a large number of species, including several complexes of cryptic species, we hope that it contributes to a better understanding of the genus Eois. Moreover, we believe that forthcoming studies in this group can take advantage of several sources of evidence, including morphology, molecular data and host plant use among other not yet properly explored (e.g., data from immature stages). In this context of integrative taxonomy, the distinct evolutionary lineages (i.e., distinct species) can be better recognized and defined, unveiling the real biodiversity of this large genus of moths.

Supplemental Information

Supplemental Information 1. Fasta File with sequences used in this study.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11304/supp-1

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Andr Rangel Nascimento and Tara Joy Massad for providing some of the Eois samples used here, to Thamara Zacca for critical reading of the manuscript and to Eric J. Tepe for providing identification for some Piper species used in this study. This study is part of the project Dimensions US-Biota So Paulo: Chemically mediated multi-trophic interaction diversity across tropical gradients (Fapesp 2014/50316-7).

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Fundao de Amparo Pesquisa do Estado de So Paulo (FAPESP) with the scholarship awarded by SSM (grants FAPESP 2015/170475, FAPESP 2016/201965), YZM (2019/02727-1) and MAS (FAPESP 2015/26823-9). AVLF thanks the Brazilian Research CouncilCNPq (grant 303834/2015-3), the FAPESP (grants no. 2011/50225-3, 2012/50260-6, 2013/50297-0) and The United States Agency for International DevelopmentUSAID/the U.S. National Academy of Sciences (NAS), under the PEER program (Sponsor Grant Award Number: AID-OAA-A-11-00012). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Simeo S. Moraes conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.

Ygor Z. Montebello conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.

Mariana A. Stanton conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.

Lydia Fumiko Yamaguchi performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Massuo J. Kato performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Andr V.L. Freitas conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Field Study Permissions

The following information was supplied relating to field study approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Field permits were granted by ICMBio (Instituto Chico Mendes para Biodiversidade) (permit number 10362-1, permit number 15780-10 and permit number 22205-6).

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

The new generated sequences are available at GenBank and in the Supplementary File. The accessions from sequences retrieved from Genbank are also available in Table 1:

GQ433544.1, GQ433557.1, GQ433564.1, GQ433565, GQ433565.1, HQ576249.1, JF859258.1, JQ179870.1, JQ179873.1, JQ179875.1, JQ179880.1, JQ179891.1, JQ179895.1, JQ179901.1, JQ179902.1, JQ179903.1, JQ179905.1, JQ179906.1, JQ179915.1, JQ179923.1, JQ179924.1, JQ179941.1, JQ424371.1, JQ424372.1, JQ424374.1, JQ424375.1, JQ424379.1, JX150863.1, JX150931.1, KU381055.1, KU381316.1, KU381753.1, MG572804.1, MG572805.1, MG572814.1.

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data are available in the Supplementary File.

The holotypes and paratypes of new described species are deposited at Zoological Collection of the Museu da Diversidade Biolgica da Universidade Estadual de Campinas (ZUEC), Campinas, So Paulo, Brazil (accession numbers LEPSM901, K2452-5, K2452-2, M155-12, M155-3, LEPSM922) and at Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de So Paulo (MZSP), So Paulo, So Paulo, Brazil (accession numbers K2452-1, K2452-4, M157-3, M156-5).

New Species Registration

The following information was supplied regarding the registration of a newly described species:

Publication LSID: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9450BCDC-7EB9-4CA6-BC76-04324F81ACA4

Eois ewa Moraes & Stanton LSID: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:A0C8118B-29C7-41E1-8434-5FFDEBFB3064,

Eois oxum Moraes & Freitas LSID: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:CB95F8D8-E007-42D5-8C76-3A3FEE15D967.

Eois oya Moraes & Montebello LSID: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:C17CD8C7-D933-4C9E-8307-F74CC05D6CA1.

References

  • Birket-Smith (1974).Birket-Smith J. Morphology of the male genitalia of Lepidoptera I. Ditrysia. Entomologica Scandinavica. 1974;5:1–22. [Google Scholar]
  • Brehm et al. (2011).Brehm G, Bodner F, Strutzenberger P, Hnefeld F, Fiedler K. Neotropical Eois (Lepidoptera: Geometridae): checklist, biogeography, diversity and description patterns. Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 2011;104(6):1091–1107. doi: 10.1603/AN10050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Carstens et al. (2013).Carstens BC, Pelletier TA, Reid NM, Salter JD. How to fail at species delimitation. Molecular Ecology. 2013;22(17):4369–4383. doi: 10.1111/mec.12413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Folmer et al. (1994).Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome coxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology. 1994;3:294–299. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Galicia, Snchez & Cordeiro (2008).Galicia I, Snchez V, Cordeiro C. On the function of signa, a genital trait of female Lepidoptera. Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 2008;101:786–793. [Google Scholar]
  • Guimares, Queiroz & Medeiros (2020).Guimares EF, Queiroz GA, Medeiros EVSS. Piper in Flora do Brasil 2020. Jardim Botnico do Rio de Janeiro. Disponvel em. 2020. http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/reflora/floradobrasil/FB12836 http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/reflora/floradobrasil/FB12836
  • Hoang et al. (2018).Hoang DT, Chernomor O, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ, Vinh LS. UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2018;35:518–522. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Holloway (1997).Holloway JD. The moths of Borneo. Part 10. Geometridae Sterrhinae, Larentiinae. Malayan Nature Journal. 1997;51:1–242. [Google Scholar]
  • Hulst (1896).Hulst GD. A classification of the Geometrina of North Amrica, with descriptions of new genera and species. Transactions of the American Entomological Society. 1896;23:245–386. [Google Scholar]
  • Katoh et al. (2002).Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Research. 2002;14(14):3059–3066. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkf436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kearse et al. (2012).Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, Ashton B, Mentjies P, Drummond A. Geneious basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(12):1647–1649. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Klots (1956).Klots AB. Lepidoptera. In: Tuxen LS, editor. Taxonomists Glossary of Genitalia in Insects. Copenhagen: Munksgaard; 1956. pp. 97–110. [Google Scholar]
  • Miller, Pfeiffer & Schwartz (2010).Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T. Creating the CIPRES science gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. Gateway Computing Environments Workshop 2010; 2010. pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • Mitter, Davis & Cummings (2017).Mitter C, Davis DR, Cummings MP. Phylogeny and evolution of Lepidoptera. Annual Review of Entomology. 2017;62(1):265–283. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-031616-035125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Moraes & Duarte (2009).Moraes SS, Duarte M. Morfologia comparada das trs espcies do complexo Telchin licus (Drury) (Lepidoptera, Castniidae) com nova sinonmia. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia. 2009;53(2):245–265. doi: 10.1590/S0085-56262009000200007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Moraes, Otero & Freitas (2017).Moraes SS, Otero LS, Freitas AVL. Natural history and comparative morphology of immatures of gamelia anableps (C. Felder & R. Felder) (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae, Hemileucinae) Neotropical Entomology. 2017;46:397–408. doi: 10.1007/s13744-016-0473-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Moraes et al. (2021).Moraes SS, Murillo-Ramos L, Machado PA, Ghanavi HR, Magaldi L, Silva-brando KL, Kato MJ, Freitas AVL, Wahlberg N. A double-edged sword: unrecognized cryptic diversity and taxonomic impediment in Eois (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) Zoologica Scripta. 2021:1–14. Epub ahead of print 07 April 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • Mutuura (1972).Mutuura A. Morphology of the female terminalia in Lepidoptera, and its taxonomic significance. Canadian Entomologist. 1972;104(7):1055–1071. doi: 10.4039/Ent1041055-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Ogata et al. (1957).Ogata M, Okada Y, Okagaki H, Sibatani A. Male genitalia of Lepidoptera: morphology and nomenclature III. Appendages pertaining to the tenth somite. Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 1957;50(3):237–244. doi: 10.1093/aesa/50.3.237. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Okagaki et al. (1955).Okagaki H, Sibatani A, Ogata M, Okada Y. Male genitalia of Lepidoptera: morphology and nomenclature II. Morphological significance of sacculus and furca. Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 1955;8(6):438–442. doi: 10.1093/aesa/48.6.438. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Pierce (1909).Pierce FN. The genitalia of the group Noctuidae of the Lepidoptera of the British Islands. An account of the morphology of the male clasping organs. Liverpool: A. W. Duncan; 1909. p. 88. [Google Scholar]
  • Pierce (1914).Pierce FN. The genitalia of the group Geometridae of the Lepidoptera of the British Islands. An account of the morphology of the male clasping organs and the corresponding organs of the female. Liverpool: A. W. Duncan; 1914. p. 84. [Google Scholar]
  • Pitkin (2002).Pitkin LM. Neotropical ennomine moths: a review of the genera (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 2002;135(23):121–401. doi: 10.1046/j.1096-3642.2002.00012.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Puillandre et al. (2012).Puillandre N, Lambert A, Brouillet S, Achaz G. ABGD, automatic barcode gap discovery for primary species delimitation. Molecular Ecology. 2012;21(8):1864–1877. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05239.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rindge (1990).Rindge FH. A revision of the Melanolophiini (Lepidoptera, Geometridae) Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History. 1990;199:1–148. [Google Scholar]
  • Sibatani et al. (1954).Sibatani A, Ogata M, Okada Y, Okagaki H. Male genitlia of Lepidoptera: morphology and nomenclature. I. Divisions of the valvae in Rhopalocera, Phalaenidae (= Noctuidae) and Geometridae. Annals of Entomological Society of America. 1954;47(1):93–106. doi: 10.1093/aesa/47.1.93. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Scoble (1999).Scoble MJ. A taxonomic catalogue to the Geometridae of the world (Insecta: Lepidoptera) Vol. 2. Clayton: CSIRO Publications; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • Sihvonen et al. (2011).Sihvonen P, Mutanen M, Kaila L, Brehm G, Hausmann A, Straude HS. Comprehensive molecular sampling yields a robust phylogeny for geometrid moths (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) PLOS ONE. 2011;6(6):e20356. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Stamatakis (2014).Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(9):1312–1313. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Strutzenberger et al. (2011).Strutzenberger P, Brehm G, Bodner F, Zimmermann M, Wiemers M, Fiedler K. DNA barcoding-based species delimitation increases species count of Eois (Geometridae) moths in a well-studied tropical mountain forest by up to 50% Insect Science. 2011;18(3):349–362. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7917.2010.01366.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Strutzenberger, Brehm & Fiedler (2012).Strutzenberger P, Brehm G, Fiedler K. DNA Barcode sequencing from old type specimens as a tool in taxonomy: a case study in the diverse genus Eois (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) PLOS ONE. 2012;7(11):e49710. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Strutzenberger et al. (2017).Strutzenberger P, Brehm G, Gottsberger B, Bodner F, Seifert CL, Fiedler K. Diversification rates, host plant shifts and an updated molecular phylogeny of Andean Eois moths (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) PLOS ONE. 2017;12(12):e0188430. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wahlberg & Wheat (2008).Wahlberg N, Wheat CW. Genomic outposts serve the phylogenomic pioneers: Designing novel nuclear markers for genomic DNA extractions of Lepidoptera. Systematic Biology. 2008;57(2):231–242. doi: 10.1080/10635150802033006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wehrli (1939).Wehrli E. Subfamilie: geometrinae, Die Gross Schmetterlinge der Erde. In: Seitz A, editor. Abt. I. Die Spannerartigen Nachtfalter. Bd. 4 (Supplement) Vol. 4. A. Kernen, Stuttgart: Verlag; 1939. pp. 19–53. [Google Scholar]
  • Wilson et al. (2012).Wilson JS, Forister ML, Dyer LA, OConnor JM, Burls K, Feldman CR, Jaramillo MA, Miller JS, Rodr.guez-Casta.eda G, Tepe FJ, Whitefield JB, Young B. Host conservatism, host shifts and diversification across three trophic levels in two Neotropical forests. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 2012;25:532–546. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02446.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Winter (2000).Winter WD. Basic techniques for observing and studying moths and butterflies. Memoirs of the Lepidopterists Society. 2000;5:1–444. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Information 1. Fasta File with sequences used in this study.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11304/supp-1

Data Availability Statement

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data are available in the Supplementary File.

The holotypes and paratypes of new described species are deposited at Zoological Collection of the Museu da Diversidade Biolgica da Universidade Estadual de Campinas (ZUEC), Campinas, So Paulo, Brazil (accession numbers LEPSM901, K2452-5, K2452-2, M155-12, M155-3, LEPSM922) and at Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de So Paulo (MZSP), So Paulo, So Paulo, Brazil (accession numbers K2452-1, K2452-4, M157-3, M156-5).


Articles from PeerJ are provided here courtesy of PeerJ, Inc

RESOURCES