Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 24;99(5):skab093. doi: 10.1093/jas/skab093

Table 2.

Range in the outcome percentage of scored cows for each welfare indicator among the top and bottom performing 20% of study farms during grazing (VISIT1) and when housed (VISIT2)

Grazing Housed
Top 20% Bottom 20% Top 20% Bottom 20%
Ranked indicator1 Min % Max % Min % Max % Min % Max % Min % Max %
Mobility 0.8 4.7 15.3 31.5 0 4.5 13.3 28
Body condition 95.5 100 28.3 80.5 87.7 95.7 28.9 66.7
Ocular discharge 0 0 78.7 95.7 6.5 27.4 68.4 94
Nasal discharge 1.8 14.9 43.8 85.5 1.9 15.7 53.3 88.6
Tail lacerations 0 0 2.3 17.7 0 0 5.9 21.8
Tail breaks 0 2.8 13.6 51.6 0 1.8 14 47.3
Tail docks2 0 0 10 74.5
Integument 0 2.4 12.4 29.3 4.1 14.2 29.3 49.2
Avoidance
 Total 51 73.8 91.4 100
 Pen 33.3 60 91.2 100
 Feed-face 4 25 60.5 89.3

1Mobility, combined percentage of MS2 and MS3 scored cows; BCS, percentage of cows meeting the target levels of 2.75 to 3.25 at grazing and 3.0 to 3.5 for housing; ocular discharge, combined percentage of cows scoring OS1 to OS3; nasal discharge, combined percentage of cows scoring NS1 to NS3; tail lacerations, tail breaks, and tail docks, percentage of cows displaying each injury; integument, mean total percentage of integument alterations observed in all zones combined; avoidance, percentage of cows responding at levels 1 and 2 combined (Fearful response category).

2Docked tails were only recorded at VISIT2 when housed.