Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 2;38(2):207–217. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2020.98451

TABLE 4.

Pairwise comparisons for weekly training load.

Weekly training load Mean (± SD) pairwise comparison p ES
Playing experience
high 2133 (± 1216) high-medium < 0.001 0.52 small
medium 1420 (± 1450) high-low 1 0.16 trivial
low 2315 (± 1035) medium-low < 0.001 0.70 moderate
Playing position
guard 2388 (± 1549) guard-forward 0.001 0.41 small
forward 1846 (± 1037) guard-center 0.002 0.56 small
center 1633 (± 1114) forward-center 0.572 0.20 trivial
Playing time
high-MPG 1776 (± 1072) high-medium 0.002 0.42 small
medium-MPG 2228 (± 1072) high-low 1 0.09 trivial
low-MPG 1864 (± 927) medium-low 0.014 0.36 small
Season phase
first 2168 ± (1057) first-second 0.002 0.34 small
second 1827 (± 924) first-playoff 0.021 0.30 small
playoff 1872 (± 904) second- playoff 1 0.05 trivial
Recovery cycle
short (< 7d) 1539 (± 1410) short-long < 0.001 0.77 moderate
long (≥ 7d) 2373 (± 600)
Previous game outcome
win 1866 (± 820) win-loss 0.21 small
loss 2046 (± 939)
Previous opponent level
high 2027 (± 892) high-medium 0.04 trivial
medium 1987 (± 1074) high-low 0.19 trivial
low 1853 (± 985) medium-low 0.13 trivial
Upcoming opponent level
high 1667 (± 1049) high-medium 0.08 0.24 small
medium 1905 (± 931) high-low < 0.001 0.61 moderate
low 2295 (± 1007) medium-low 0.01 0.40 small