Skip to main content
. 2021 May 21;161(3):1011–1029.e11. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.05.039

Supplementary Table 1.

Included Studies on Prevalence of Asymptomatic Infection

First author, year, design, setting, dates Local prevalence Symptom screening
Testing strategy
Type of screening Positive screening Type of test,timing of test Positive asymptomatic cases, n Total cases, n Asymptomatic prevalence, %
Bowyer, 20219 Retrospective
United States (IL)
5/22/20–6/28/20
8.4% local positivity rate for Winnebago County, IL between 9/1/20 and 9/9/20 ASGE preprocedure risk screening questionnaire 122/1000 = 12.2%
positive
Of those, 3 of 122 (2.46%) were SARS-CoV–positive
NP swab Roche COBAS 6800/8800
RT-PCR
72 h prior
5 878 0.57
Casper, 202010 Retrospective
Germany
3/23/20–5/10/20
Cumulative incidence in Saarland: 279 per
100,000
During study period, 2514 tested positive in Saarland
Symptom screeninga NR NP swab RT-PCR
Testing for all outpatients starting April 2020
<5 d prior
0 313 0
Haidar, 202113 Prospective
United States (PA, NY)
Period 1: April 21, 2020–June 11, 2020
Period 2: June 12, 2020–September 10, 2020
Period 3: September 11, 2020–December 15, 2020 (universal testing deimplemented)
Total new cases in Allegheny County:
Period 1: 1056
Period 2: 10,014
Period 3: 30,524
Symptom screening: fever, cough, and shortness of breath, and asked to self-report other symptoms <7 d of procedure, 1–4 d prior, and day of procedure 16/817 (1.9%) NP swab
Cepheid Xpert Xpress RT-PCR
1–4 d preprocedure with results in <24 h with a subset of negative patients randomly selected for repeat testing on the same day of the procedure (with results <1 h)
Period 1: 10
Period 2: 54
Period 3: 101
Period 1: 10,539
Period 2: 34,948
(“summer surge”)
Period 3: 24,741 (“fall surge”)
Period 1: 0.10
Period 2: 0.15
Period 3: 0.41
Hernandez Camba, 202116
Retrospective
Spain
4/27/20–6/15/20
NR Screening questionnaire (fever, cough, sore throat, or breathing problems, known exposure, and loss of smell or taste)
3 d prior and 14 d after
0/211: 0% SARS-CoV2 antibody test followed by RT-PCR if positive only within 48 h 0a 211 0
Lewis, 202117,b Retrospective
United States (NC)
3/31/2020–4/20/2020
NR Symptom screeningc NR 5 in-house tests: CDC’s 2019-nCOV RT-PCR
diagnostic panel, Diasorin Simplexa COVID-19 direct assay, Cepheid Xpert Xpress, Abbott real-time SARS-CoV02 assay, Abbott ID NOW
72 h prior
6 1580 0.4
Tworek, 202119 Retrospective
United States (MI)
4/15/20–5/15/20
NR Symptom screeningc
2 d prior
NR ID NOW
RT-PCR (gold standard)
ID NOW: 0
RT-PCR: 3
386 IDNow: 0
RT-PCR 0.77
Hayee, 202115 Multicenter prospective study
United Kingdom 4/30/2020–6/30/2020
NR Telephone screening (SCOTS:
questions on symptoms, infectious contacts, occupational risk, travel, shielding status
NR NP swab
Type of test NR
3 2611 0.11
Hayee, 202114 Multicenter prospective study
United Kingdom
Rising incidence after emergence of new UK variant: at least 800 cases per 100,000
population per week
Telephone screening (SCOTS:
questions on symptoms, infectious contacts, occupational risk, travel, shielding status
NR NP swab
Type of test NR
9 2449 0.37
Mays, 202018
Cross-sectional
United States (University of Washington)
4/13/20
2-5%
region prevalence
Symptom screeninga 137/133
6 (10.3%)
PCR testing (DiaSorin Simplexa SARS-COV-2, Hologic Panther Fusion, or Roche COBAS) prior admission or surgical procedure 5 787 0.6
Albendin-Iglesias, 20208 Prospective observational cross-sectional
Spain
4/15/20–5/15/20
3.34/100,000 between May 1 and May 15, 2020 NR NR NP or OP with Allplex 2019-nCoV Assay (Seegene, Seoul, South Korea) 21 363 0.27
Dolinger, 202011 Retrospective single center study
United States (NY City)
5/1/20–6/30/20
May NY State prevalence 5.34% and NY City 6.27%
June NY State prevalence 1.20% and NY City 1.43%
NR NR PCR testing 48–72 h before procedures 6 623 0.96
Gawron, 2021 (personal communication) Retrospective multicenter VAHCS
United States
3/18/20–12/31/20
NR Symptom screening (flu, cough, fever), travel history, known exposure
7 d before endoscopy
2497/57,892
869 PCR-positive (1.5%)
RT-PCR within 7 d of procedure 106 129,410
92,030
0.1
Forde, 202012
Retrospective single center study
United States (FL)
Miami-Dade County: 12.7%. In
system’s catchment area: 5.4%–9.5%
Symptom screening (fever, conjunctivitis, cough, sore throat, difficulty breathing, diarrhea, body aches, or lack of smell or taste in the last 3 d), travel history, known exposure
7–9 d prior, and on day of procedure
NR CE-IVD kit Gene-Finder COVID-19 Plus
RealAmp Kit, QIAstat-Dx Respiratory 2019-nCoV- 2, and Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2
1 396 0.25%

ASGE, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; NP, nasopharyngeal; OP, oropharyngeal; VAHCS, Veterans Affairs Health Care System.

a

In this study, antibody testing was used instead of RT-PCR. If IgM-positive, SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing was conducted. If positive, endoscopy was postponed. If negative, PCR was repeated and if negative again, endoscopy was performed. In this study, 1.9% (4 of 211) patients (95% CI, 0.07%–4.8%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, which does not indicate active infection; asymptomatic prevalence was 0% (RT-PCR was negative in the 4 patients with positive antibody testing)

b

In the study, pre-procedure testing included all ambulatory procedures, encompassing endoscopy. If cases were urgent, providers wore N95s/PAPRs if COVID status was unknown.

c

Symptom screening indicates that authors reported using symptom screening but provided no details as to the type of screening tool or questions.