Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 22;29(8):804–815. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2020.11.004

Table 1.

Participant Characteristics at Baseline

Total Sample AEP Control
Age 71.47 (7.51) 70.70 (8.83) 72.33 (6.12)
Sex (female) 13 (68.4%) 8 (80%) 5 (56%)
Race (White)a 16 (84.2%) 8 (80%) 8 (89%)
Marriedb 8 (42.1%) 3 (30%) 3 (33%)
Living alone 9 (47.4%) 6 (60%) 3 (33%)
Education (college or greater) 15 (79%) 8 (80%) 7 (78%)
Cognitive performance (MOCA) 25.63 (2.56) 24.90 (3.00) 26.44 (1.81)
Depressive symptoms (PROMIS)c 49.57 (8.87) 48.35 (9.54) 50.78 (8.53)
Anxiety symptoms (PROMIS) c 50.18 (10.23) 46.98 (10.61) 53.39 (9.30)
Disability/functioning (WHODAS) 8.87 (7.98) 7.45 (8.10) 10.44 (8.01)
Berkman Social Integration 19.57 (5.14) 20.00 (4.69) 19.11 (5.84)
Social self-efficacy (PROMIS) c,d 45.71 (7.77) 46.35 (8.34) 45.00 (7.52)
Emotional support (PROMIS) c 50.33 (7.66) 52.85 (8.88) 49.37 (6.94)
Loneliness (UCLA) 43.59 (11.82) 43.00 (12.00) 44.11 (12.36)

Note: Values represent mean (std) for continuous variables or n (%) for binary variables.

a

1 participant identified as black, 1 as multiracial, and 1 declined to report on race.

b

7 participants reported being divorced, 1 legally separated, 3 widowed, and 0 as never married.

c

PROMIS scales are computerized adaptive tests with population normed T-scores with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.

d

The full title for the ‘social self-efficacy’ scale is ‘self-efficacy to manage social interactions.’