Skip to main content
. 2021 May 19;9:e11483. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11483

Table 1. Activity measure of redox enzymes expressed as IU per mg of fresh liver weight (FLW) in each experimental group.

Enzyme activity
(IU/mg LFW)
S−P− S−P+ S+P − S+P+ p-value
CAT (x106) 221.6 ± 19.7c 167.1 ± 9.6a 228.5 ± 27.0c 182.4 ± 14.8ab 0.044
GR 3.6 ± 0.4a 3.2 ± 0.4a 2.4 ± 0.2a 3.1 ± 0.3a 0.380
GPX 5,839.0 ± 1,020.8a 5,997.9 ± 659.0ab 9,516.6 ± 1,801.7c 8,194.9 ± 1,383.5bc 0.025
Total GST 223.6 ± 7.9a 220.6 ± 7.7a 227.3 ± 6.7a 230.9 ± 8.3a 0.454
Total SOD 3,304.8 ± 179.0a 3,320.6 ± 67.8a 3,227.8 ± 71.3a 3,378.6 ± 199.5a 0.566
SOD1 2,236.3 ± 182.3a 2,356.1 ± 67.3a 2,169.1 ± 137.3a 2,238.2 ± 258.8a 0.776
SOD2 1,068.5 ± 73.3a 970.3 ± 49.9a 1,058.6 ± 82.5a 1,140.4 ± 61.4a 0.112

Notes.

Data are represented as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 3–5/group). Different letters mean significative differences (ANOVA, p ≤ 0.05).

CAT
catalase
GR
glutathione reductase
GPX
glutathione peroxidase
GST
glutathione S-transferase
SOD
superoxide dismutase
SOD1
Cu,Zn-SOD, cytosolic
SOD2
Mn-SOD, mitochondrial
S−P−
rats neither exposed to stress nor with piracetam treatment
S−P+
rats not exposed to stress but treated with piracetam
S+P−
rats exposed to stress without piracetam treatment
S+P+
rats exposed to stress and treated with piracetam