Skip to main content
. 2021 May 22;2021(5):CD012721. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012721.pub3

Summary of findings 5. Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) compared to usual care for chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

ARNIs compared to usual care for chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
Patient or population: patients with chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
Setting: secondary care
Intervention: ARNI (sacubitril‐valsartan)
Comparison: ARB (valsartan)
Outcomes Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) Relative effect
(95% CI) № of participants
(studies) Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE) Comments
Risk with usual care Risk with ARNI
Cardiovascular mortality (RR)
Median follow‐up: 35 months
Study population RR 0.96
(0.79 to 1.15) 4796
(1 study) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE1  
89 per 1,000 85 per 1,000
(70 to 102)
Heart failure hospitalisation, first (RR)
Range of follow‐up: 24 weeks to 35 months
Study population RR 0.89
(0.80 to 1.00)
7362
(2 studies)
⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE1  
142 per 1,000 126 per 1,000
(113 to 142)
Hyperkalaemia
Range of follow‐up: 36 weeks to 35 months
Study population RR 0.88
(0.77 to 1.01) 5054
(2 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE1  
147 per 1,000 129 per 1,000
(113 to 148)
All‐cause mortality (RR)
Range of follow‐up: 36 weeks to 35 months
Study population (RR 0.97
CI 0.84 to 1.11)
7663
(3 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH  
138 per 1,000 134 per 1,000
(117 to 153)
Quality of life
Range of follow‐up: 36 weeks to 35 months
PARAMOUNT reported change from baseline for the KCCQ overall summary score for the intervention arm (n =118) as 11.25 (2.185) and the control arm (n = 116) as 11.31 (2.183) and summarised the findings as "no difference in KCCQ score between treatment groups".
PARAGON‐HF reported a difference of the clinical summary score KCCQ between treatment arms as 1.0 (0.0 to 2.1).
PARALLAX reported "KCCQ improved in both treatment groups, with an early benefit of S/V that was no longer significant after 24 week".
⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH  
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

ARB: Angiotensin receptor blocker; ARNIs: Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors; CI: Confidence interval; KCCQ: Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire; MD: Mean difference; RCT: Randomised controlled trial; RR: Risk ratio
GRADE Working Group grades of evidenceHigh certainty: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate certainty: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low certainty: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low certainty: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1Downgraded by one level due to imprecision.