Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 27;30(6):829–848. doi: 10.1007/s00787-020-01498-4

Table 3.

Random effect models and sub-group analyses with emotion regulation as outcome

Reduced data set m k n Hedges g 95% CI p (z test) Q p (Q) T2 I2 (%)
Emotion regulation 13 12 1513 0.36 0.14, 0.58 0.00 66.56 0.00 0.010 70.80
Emotion regulation by
Intervention
 CBT intervention 8 8 969 0.45 0.15, 0.75 35.96 0.00 0.12 71.32
 ER intervention 4 4 269 0.22 − 0.15, 0.58 58.86 0.06 0.08 58.86
Control group
 Active control 8 8 521 0.20 − 0.01, 0.42 9.99 0.19 0.03 32.10
 Passive control 5 4 992 0.57 0.22, 0.93 25.71 0.00 0.12 77.35
Quality rating
 Strong 1 1 82 0.53 0.09, 0.96 0.00
 Moderate 7 7 1148 0.29 − 0.07, 0.65 63.03 0.00 0.19 84.30
 Weak 5 4 283 0.44 0.20, 0.68 1.82 0.77 0.00 0.00
Full-data set
 Emotion regulation 14 13 1538 0.43 0.18, 0.69 0.00 77.82 0.00 0.16 77.89
 Emotion regulation by
Intervention
 CBT intervention 7 7 969 0.58 0.30, 0.85 59.96 0.00 0.07 59.96
 ER intervention 5 5 321 0.57 − 0.17, 1.32 23.53 0.00 0.63 90.13
Control group
 Active control 9 9 546 0.37 0.01, 0.73 26.64 0.00 0.22 75.35
 Passive control 5 4 992 0.57 0.22, 0.93 25.71 0.00 0.12 77.35
Quality rating
 Strong 1 1 82 0.53 0.09, 0.96 0.00
 Moderate 7 7 1148 0.29 − 0.07, 0.65 63.03 0.00 0.19 84.30
 Weak 5 4 308 0.63 0.16, 1.10 14.38 0.01 0.24 72.89