Skip to main content
. 2021 May 23;126(8):6601–6624. doi: 10.1007/s11192-021-04017-7

Table 2.

Specialties on the front lines against COVID-19: relative size and professors’ research performance (Pctl 100 = top) vis-à-vis all bibliometric fields (218) in the Italian academic system (percentage share of total staff in the dataset, in brackets)

Specialty No. of Professors* Size (Pctl) Research performance (Pctl)
Pathology 489 (8.7%) 93.5 99.1
Cardiac & cardiovascular systems 247 (4.4%) 79.1 95.0
Cell biology 244 (4.3%) 78.7 92.7
Respiratory system 105 (1.9%) 42.5 89.9
Microbiology 120 (2.1%) 49.5 89.0
Biochemistry & molecular biology 154 (2.7%) 61.1 87.1
Clinical neurology 350 (6.2%) 88.4 84.4
Public health 429 (7.6%) 93.0 82.4
General internal medicine 739 (13.2%) 97.6 79.3
Pharmacology & pharmacy 637 (11.3%) 95.8 77.9
Medicinal chemistry 428 (7.6%) 92.5 70.6
Anesthesiology and emergency medicine 216 (3.8%) 76.8 70.1
Medical laboratory technology 141 (2.5%) 56.9 65.9
Virology 310 (5.5%) 85.6 64.1
Pediatrics 332 (5.9%) 87.5 63.6
Infectious diseases 139 (2.5%) 56.0 49.4
Radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging 320 (5.7%) 86.1 48.4
Immunology 110 (2.0%) 45.8 42.9
Nursing 32 (0.6%) 7.8 27.7
Pharmaceutical biology 72 (1.3%) 21.7 25.4
Total 5614

*On staff for at least three years in the 2014–2018 period