Skip to main content
. 2021 May 10;12:647596. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.647596

TABLE 6.

Moderating effect of adolescents’ grade and gender on the relation between father-adolescent communication and adolescents’ depressive symptoms.

Variable Depressive symptoms
B SE t p 95% CI
School rank
Above average 0.079 0.101 0.78 0.436 −0.120, 0.278
Best –0.063 0.125 –0.50 0.615 −0.307, 0.181
School location
Urban-rural fringe area –0.024 0.097 –0.249 0.803 −0.215, 0.167
Central urban area 0.283 0.099 2.860 0.004 0.089, 0.476
Family economic status
Middle income –0.708 0.094 –7.51 <0.001 −0.893, −0.523
Rich –0.693 0.164 –4.23 <0.001 −1.014, −0.372
Father education 0.050 0.024 2.10 0.036 0.003, 0.097
Mother education –0.081 0.024 –3.33 0.001 −0.128, −0.033
Mother communication –0.139 0.016 –8.66 <0.001 −0.171, −0.108
Father communication –0.119 0.015 –7.88 <0.001 −0.149, −0.089
Grade 0.811 0.069 11.69 <0.001 0.675, 0.947
Gender –0.506 0.070 –7.20 <0.001 −0.644, −0.369
Father communication × Grade –0.039 0.024 –1.61 0.108 −0.088, 0.009
Father communication × Gender 0.031 0.024 1.30 0.195 −0.016, 0.079
Grade × Gender –0.136 0.139 –0.98 0.327 −0.407, 0.136
Father communication × Grade × Gender 0.075 0.048 1.56 0.119 −0.019, 0.170

CI, confidence interval. Grade: 0 = 7th grade, 1 = 9th grade; Gender: 0 = girl, 1 = boy. Reference group: Medium and below on School rank; town and country on School location; poor family on Family economic status.