Table 2.
Matrix | Samples | Location | Virus type | Persistence | Main findings | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Water/wastewater/sewage/river | Pasteurized and Unpasteurized wastewater | Michigan, USA | MHV, φ6, and MS2 and T3 | MHV and φ6 persisted (T90%) for 13 and 7 h, respectively, at 25 °C in unpasteurized wastewater with lesser persistent in pasteurized wastewater at 10 °C, while MS2 persisted for 121 h. T3 persisted much longer than other surrogate viruses considered. |
The persistence of enveloped viruses in wastewater indicated concerns for their inactivation in wastewater treatment facilities. | Ye et al. (2016) |
Water (reagent grade), lake water, and pasteurized settled sewage | Chapel Hill, NC, USA | TGEV and MHV | TGEV and MHV persisted for 22 (T90%) and 17 days, respectively, at 25 °C in water (reagent grade). However, TGEV and MHV persisted for 9 (T99%) and 7 days, respectively, at 25 °C in pasteurized settled sewage. The infectivity decreases by <1 log10 for both viruses after 4 weeks at 4 °C. | The coronaviruses (based on surrogates TGEV and MHV) could remain infectious for long period in water and sewage matrices at low and ambient temperatures of 4 and 25 °C, respectively. | Casanova et al. (2009) | |
Hospital wastewater, dechlorinated tap water, domestic sewage | Beijing City, China | SARS-CoV | SARS-CoV persisted for 2 days at 20 °C and 14 days at 4 °C in hospital wastewater, dechlorinated tap water, and domestic sewage. However, the persistence was extended for 14 days in wastewater at 4 °C. | Conventional disinfectant like chorine is highly effective to inactive SARS-CoV | Wang et al. (2005) | |
Tap water, primary and activated sludge (secondary) effluents | Tucson, AZ, USA. | SARS-CoV | 10–12 days at 23 °C in dechlorinated tap water and >100 days at 4 °C. 2–3 days 23 °C in primary sewage. 3 days 23 °C in secondary sewage. |
The persistence of SARS-CoV is longer in primary wastewater than secondary wastewater due to the presence of organic material and suspended solids. | Gundy et al. (2009) | |
Untreated wastewater, autoclaved wastewater, and dechlorinated tap water | Brisbane, Australia | SARS-CoV-2 and MHV | SARS-CoV-2 RNA: 8–28 days in untreated wastewater, 6–43 days in autoclaved wastewater, and 9–59 days in dechlorinated tap water, all at 4–37 °C. MHV RNA: 7–57 days in untreated wastewater, 6–43 days in autoclaved wastewater, and 11–44 days in tap water, all at 4–37 °C. |
The difference in persistence of both SARS-CoV-2 RNA and MHV RNA is not statistically significant. The persistence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in untreated wastewater was less sensitive to high temperature compared to other sample matrices at other temperature values. |
Ahmed et al. (2020b) | |
Tap water and untreated primary influent | Northern Indiana, USA | SARS-CoV-2 | 2 days in tap water and 2 days for wastewater, both at room temperature of 20 °C. SARS-CoV-2 infectivity significantly decreased to 15 and 2 min at 50 °C and 70 °C, respectively. The higher starting titer of 105 TCID50 mL−1 showed longer persistence of the entire sampling time course (7 days). |
The genetic material of the SARS-CoV-2 was found to be more persistent than the infectious virus. | Bivins et al. (2020) | |
Wastewater influent | Helsinki, Finland | SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2, and Norovirus GII | Both SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 RNAs persisted for 84 days at temperatures of 4 to −75 °C. Norovirus GII RNA indicated a 1-log10 reduction in persistence by between 29 and 84 days during storage. | The persistence of non-envelop viruses like norovirus is not better than enveloping viruses like SAR-CoV-2 in cold environmental conditions as against the existing belief. | Hokajärvi et al. (2021) | |
Wastewater | Paris, France | SARS-CoV-2 RNA, – Coxsackievirus B5 | Both SARS-CoV-2 RNA and protected viral RNA persisted for up to 7 and 12 days, respectively at 4 °C but showed less stability at 20 °C. Coxsackievirus B5 RNA maintained its infectivity at 10 min up to 42 °C. |
Both SARS-CoV-2 RNA, – Coxsackievirus B5 RNA have closely similar persistence levels to temperature changes. The infectivity of both viruses was preserved up to 24 h in wastewater samples. |
Wurtzer et al. (2021) | |
River water and wastewater | Minas Gerais State, Brazil | SARS-CoV-2 | SARS-CoV-2 persisted for 7.7 and 5.5 days in rain water and wastewater, respectively at 4 °C. However, the viable virus persisted more (4–4.5 times) at 24 °C in both samples. | The temperature had a strong correlation with the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 in river water and wastewater | de Oliveira et al. (2021) | |
Food/food package/food handlings | Plastic carrier (simulating contaminated food packages) and wipes | Czech Republic | Alphacoronavirus 1 | The virus persisted to a detectable limit for up to 5 days at 4 °C. Wet wipes significantly inactivated the virus from the surface of the plastic package, with no detectable of the virus after 96 h when using disinfectant wipes. |
The persistence and possible transmission of SARS-CoV-2 through plastic packaging for food can be sufficiently mitigated using wet-wiping, especially with disinfectant wet wipes. | Malenovská (2020) |
Salmon | SARS-CoV-2 | SARS-CoV-2 maintained viability when attached with the salmon for 8 days at 4 °C and 2 days at 25 °C. | Infectivity is associated with temperature in the salmon. | Dai et al. (2021) | ||
Romaine lettuce | Bovine coronavirus (strain 88) | Infectious Bovine coronavirus persisted for up to 25 days on romaine lettuce surface under refrigerated condition. | Coronavirus maintaining its viability on the lettuce surface demonstrates the possibility of zoonotic transmission to humans. | Mullis et al. (2012) | ||
Dromedary camel milk, goat milk, and cow milk | Saudi Arabia | MERS-CoV | 7 h under 4 °C refrigerated conditions. No infectious virus present in the Dromedary milk samples within 48 min at 22 °C storage. |
Heat treatment (pasteurization) decreased the infectivity of the MERS-CoV in milk samples below the detectable limit. | van Doremalen et al. (2014) | |
Lettuce, and strawberries | SARS-CoV (Strain 229E) | At 4 °C, SARS-CoV persisted for 2 days on lettuce, while the virus did not survive on strawberries. SARS-CoV persisted less on the produce at −20 °C. | Respiratory virus-like SARS-CoV could persist for a while on fresh fruits under refrigeration conditions (temperature) commonly used to store them in the household. | Yépiz-Gómez et al. (2013) | ||
Environmental compartments | Aerosols | New Orleans, Fort Detrick, and Pittsburgh, in the USA. | SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV |
At prevailing environmental conditions of 23 °C and 53% RH, the SARS-CoV-2 maintained its infectivity up to 16 h, more than SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV. | SARS-CoV-2 could persist very long in aerosol and indicates the possibility of serving as an airborne pathogen. | Fears et al. (2020) |
Aerosols, plastic, stainless steel, copper, cardboard | NA | Infectious SARS-CoV-2, and SARS-CoV | At 21–23 °C and 40% RH, both viable SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV persisted for 72 h on plastic, and stainless steel with a significant reduction on stainless steel after 48 h and plastic after 72 h. Viable SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV persisted for only 4 and 8 h, respectively, on copper, while they persisted for 24 and 8, respectively, on cardboard. Viable SARS-CoV-2 persisted for 2.64 h in aerosol (the experimental duration was 3 h) while SARS-CoV persisted for up to 2.43 h | Both viable SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV demonstrated similar persistence on surfaces and aerosols under the same environmental conditions. | van Doremalen et al. (2020) | |
Glass, wood, mask (inner and outer surface), stainless steel, paper, tissue paper, banknote paper | NA | SARS-CoV-2 | At environmental conditions of 22 °C, pH of 3–10, and 65% RH, SARS-CoV-2 was viable up to 2 days on glass, 1 day on wood, 7 days on mask (outside surface), 4 days on mask (inner surface), 4 days on stainless steel, 30 min on paper and tissue paper, and 2 days on banknote paper. | SARS-CoV-2 is highly stable under favorable environmental conditions but very susceptible to disinfectants. | Chin et al. (2020) | |
Polytetrafluoroethylene, polyvinyl chloride, Ceramic tiles, glass, silicone rubber, and stainless steel. | United Kingdom | SARS-CoV (Strain 229E) | The virus persisted for 5 days in all the materials at 21 °C. | While SARS-CoV was able to remain viable on different surfaces, the virus was inactivated quickly on copper alloy materials. | Warnes et al. (2015) | |
Paper, disposable gown (impervious), and cotton gown. | SARS-CoV (Strain GVU6109) | At 20 °C, SARS-CoV persisted for less than 2 h on the disposable gown, and less than 1 day on the cotton gown, and paper, | There is an unlikely transmission of the virus via droplets on paper and cotton materials, especially when it is dried. Detergents can serve as a decontaminant agent of SARS-CoV. | Lai et al. (2005) | ||
Wood boards, paper (press and filter), cloth, plastic, metal, and mosaic. | Beijing, China | SARS-CoV (Strain CoV–P9) | At 21–25 °C, SARS-CoV persisted for 4 days on wood board, 4 on press paper, 5 days on filter paper and cloth, 4 days on plastic, 4 days on glass, and 3 days on the mosaic. | The persistence of SARS-CoV in the environment is strong but highly susceptible to heating and Ultraviolet irradiation. | Duan et al. (2003) | |
Steel, plastic, and aerosol | MERS-CoV | For steel and plastic, MERS-CoV persisted for 48 h at 20 °C and 40% RH, 24 h at 30 °C and 30% RH, and 8 h at 30 °C and 80% RH. For aerosol, MERS-CoV maintained its viability at 20 °C and 40% RH. | The prolonged presence of MERS-CoV under conducive environmental conditions could aid its transmission in such an environment. | van Doremalen et al. (2013) |