Table 3.
Paths and indirect effects of parallel process latent growth models to link childhood adversity to functional network connectivity and (1) externalizing and (2) internalizing behavior.
| 95 % CI |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| β,p | lower CI | upper CI | |
| Model 1: Externalizing behavior | |||
| Neglect → FC Intercept | −.15* | −.26 | −.03 |
| Neglect → FC Slope | .10 | −.00 | .20 |
| Neglect → E Intercept | .11* | .00 | .24 |
| Neglect → E Slope | .06 | −.09 | .22 |
| Abuse → FC Intercept | .02 | −.10 | .15 |
| Abuse → FC Slope | −.06 | −.16 | .05 |
| Abuse → E Intercept | .15* | .03 | .29 |
| Abuse → E Slope | .01 | −.13 | .15 |
| FC Intercept → E Slope | −.18* | −.33 | −.03 |
| E Intercept → FC Slope | −.03 | −.06 | .12 |
| Neglect → E Intercept → FC Slope | .00 | −.01 | .02 |
| Neglect → FC Intercept → E Slope | .03* | .00 | .07 |
| Abuse → E Intercept → FC Slope | .01 | −.01 | .03 |
| Abuse → FC Intercept → E Slope | −.00 | −.03 | .02 |
| Model 2: Internalizing behavior | |||
| Neglect → FC Intercept | −.15* | −.26 | −.04 |
| Neglect → FC Slope | .10 | −.00 | .19 |
| Neglect → I Intercept | .13* | .00 | .24 |
| Neglect → I Slope | .11 | −.03 | .26 |
| Abuse → FC Intercept | .02 | −.10 | .15 |
| Abuse → FC Slope | −.04 | −.15 | .06 |
| Abuse → I Intercept | .17* | .05 | .32 |
| Abuse → I Slope | −.00 | −.16 | .15 |
| FC Intercept → I Slope | −.05 | −.22 | .13 |
| I Intercept → FC Slope | .03 | −.07 | .12 |
| Neglect → I Intercept → FC Slope | .00 | −.01 | .02 |
| Neglect → FC Intercept → I Slope | .01 | −.02 | .04 |
| Abuse → I Intercept → FC Slope | .00 | −.01 | .02 |
| Abuse → FC Intercept → I Slope | −.00 | −.02 | .01 |
Note. FC = functional connectivity from dorsal anterior cingulate cortex to regions of the cingulo-opercular network, E = externalizing, I = internalizing, β = regression weight, CI = confidence interval, p(*) = significant paths and indirect effects.