Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 15;13(1):123–128. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_298_20

Table 4.

Practice score regarding mental health disorder

Variables N (%) Mean ± SD P-value
Faculty
 Pharmacy 118 (36.4) 5.389 ± 1.365 0.001
 Medicine 81 (25.0) 5.346 ± 1.905
 Biotechnology 67 (20.6) 5.478 ± 1.511
 Business 58 (17.0) 6.448 ± 2.096
Year
 Prefinal 169 (52.2) 5.408 ± 1.757 0.037
 Final 155 (47.8) 5.781 ± 1.676
Place
 Hosteller 216 (66.7) 5.407 ± 1.579 0.017
 Nonhosteller 108 (33.3) 5.952 ± 1.946
Gender
 Male 90 (27.8) 5.517 ± 1.847 0.872
 Female 234 (72.2) 5.615 ± 1.685
Age, years
 18–20 32 (9.8) 5.313 ± 1.469 0.043
 21–25 281 (86.7) 5.655 ± 1.758
 >25 10 (3.1) 4.700 ± 1.337
Marital status
 Single 322 (99.4) 5.587 ± 1.685 0.981
 Married 2 (0.6) 5.500 ± 6.364
Race
 Malay 8 (2.4) 5.000 ± 1.414 0.810
 Chinese 231 (71.3) 5.610 ± 1.693
 Indian 82 (25.4) 5.598 ± 1.858
 Others 3 (0.9) 5.000 ± 1.732

Paired t-test/ANOVA was used to find the P-values.

Statistically significant difference was seen between the total practice score of respondents and the students’ faculty (P = 0.001), the year of education (P = 0.037), the place of living (P = 0.001), and the age groups of students (P = 0.043). In contrast, none of the other variables show a statistically significant association with the knowledge score.