TABLE 4.
Mutations under study | Mapping design | Control sample |
Software |
||||
SHOREmap1 artMAP2 | SIMPLE3 | CandiSNP4 | Jitterbug5 ITIS6 | Easymap7 | |||
Point mutations | Backcross | Parental line | D | D | D/R | ||
Phenotypically wild-type F2 or M2 | D | D/R | |||||
Outcross | Parental line | D | D/R | ||||
Phenotypically wild-type F2 or M2 | D | D/R | |||||
Large insertions | – | – | D | D |
The capabilities of some current mapping tools are compared, D and R indicating an experimental design supported by the software (with DNA-seq or RNA-seq data, respectively). 1Sun and Schneeberger (2015). 2Javorka et al. (2019). 3Wachsman et al. (2017). 4Etherington et al. (2014). 5Hénaff et al. (2015). 6Jiang et al. (2015). 7This work.