Table 1.
Germany | The Netherlands | Romania | |
---|---|---|---|
Selection of WWTPs | Eligible WWTPs are selected due to the following criteria: There are residents living in <300 m vicinity of WWTP, WWTP is located close enough to laboratories for the analyses of samples | All 21 regional waterboards 3 are included. | WWTPs are chosen to assure a good representativeness of different regions across the country. |
Invitation of WWTPs | The operators of the WWTPs are contacted by the local study team and asked to participate. | The waterboards are informed of the study through the Dutch Water Authorities and asked to participate. | The operators of the WWTPs are contacted by the local study team and asked to participate. |
Response in WWTPs | 8 WWTPs are interested in participating. | 12 waterboards are interested in participating 4. | 9 WWTPs are interested in participating. |
Study presentation and informing of WWTP workers | The study team visits 6 interested WWTPs and presents the project to the workers 1. | The WWTP workers of 10 waterboards are invited to attend a presentation of the study by the local study team 5. The workers of the remaining 2 waterboards are recruited internally through email. By sending the presentation to all workers via email, also workers not attending the meeting are reached. | The WWTP operators inform and invite the employees to participate. Afterwards, several short information sessions are organized at the WWTPs for recruiting participants. |
Informing of nearby residents | The study team researches the street names of all streets within ≤300 m vicinity of a participating WWTP through Google Maps and asks the local registration office 2 for the full address of all persons aged 16–67 years and having their main residence in those streets. | Due to concerns of the waterboards, residents living in ≤300 m vicinity of a WWTP cannot be included. | Invitations to the study are done using door-to-door approach. Additionally, in public places like streets, parks, and markets, potential participants are orally addressed and information sheets with details about the study are distributed. The participants are at least 18 years old. |
Informing of comparison group | The addresses are collected in the same way as for the nearby residents, except that addresses >1000 m away from the closest WWTP and close to a train station are chosen to allow fast transportation of samples by the study team. | All addresses within a 500 m radius of GPs, who are willing to cooperate, are identified 6. Then, 300–500 addresses per GP are randomly selected to extract personal data from the Dutch Personal Records Database (BRP). Information on the study is sent to all residents living at the selected addresses over 16 years of age. | Same procedure as for nearby residents |
Incentives for participants 7 | Participants participate in a raffle with 10 shopping vouchers with a total value of 1500 Euros. | Every participant receives a gift card worth 20 Euro. | Every participant is granted 5 Euro. |
Timing of sample taking | To control for seasonal variation of ESBL-EC, CPE, and ARGs all samples (water, air, stool) from the surroundings of one WWTP are aimed to be taken within eight weeks. |
1 Two WWTPs stepped back from participation because they feared that residents and media might complain about WWTPs in case ESBL-EC, CPE, or ARGs would be found in their WWTP. 2 If addresses cannot be retrieved from the local registration offices, members of the study team go from door to door to recruit participants. In case of no reply, up to two reminders are sent (7 and 21 days after initial invitation). Further methods will be performed to increase the response: newspaper articles describing the AWARE project published by local newspapers, online advertisement on the study’s Facebook page and in groups like notice boards and job advertisements, flyers about the AWARE study in doctors’ offices of local physicians, invitations via e-mail to workers from different work fields (industry and public sector). 3 Waterboards are regional government bodies supervising, e.g., sewage treatment in their respective regions. 4 Nine waterboards did not want to participate out of fear for causing commotion among nearby residents or workers, or lack of interest to invest time and/or manpower to help organize recruitment. 5 WWTP workers generally work at multiple WWTPs, making it impossible to study workers of specific WWTPs. Therefore, all workers of waterboards were invited to participate, but only a selection of WWTPs (1–3 per waterboard) are selected for environmental sampling. 6 General practitioners (GP) within a 2–5 km distance from selected WWTPs are approached for cooperation, to function as a collection and preservation point of stool samples. Addresses of within a 500 m radius of GPs are identified using Geographical Information System (GIS) software (version ArcGis 10.6.1). 7 Participants who hand in a stool sample and a completed questionnaire.