. 2021 May 19;13(1):1921925. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2021.1921925

Table 3.

Bayes network analysis to identify the key species responsible for gut microbiota differences

Regression	Degree
k__Bacteria\|p__Firmicutes\|c__Bacilli\|o__Lactobacillales\|f__Streptococcaceae\|g__Streptococcus\|s__Streptococcus_vestibularis	35
k__Bacteria\|p__Firmicutes\|c__Clostridia\|o__Clostridiales\|f__Peptostreptococcaceae\|g__Peptostreptococcus\|s__Peptostreptococcus_unclassified	31
k__Bacteria\|p__Actinobacteria\|c__Actinobacteria\|o__Bifidobacteriales\|f__Bifidobacteriaceae\|g__Scardovia\|s__Scardovia_unclassified	30
k__Bacteria\|p__Bacteroidetes\|c__Bacteroidia\|o__Bacteroidales\|f__Prevotellaceae\|g__Prevotella\|s__Prevotella_salivae	24
k__Bacteria\|p__Bacteroidetes\|c__Bacteroidia\|o__Bacteroidales\|f__Prevotellaceae\|g__Prevotella\|s__Prevotella_histicola	17
k__Bacteria\|p__Actinobacteria\|c__Actinobacteria\|o__Actinomycetales\|f__Actinomycetaceae\|g__Actinomyces\|s__Actinomyces_odontolyticus	12
k__Bacteria\|p__Firmicutes\|c__Bacilli\|o__Lactobacillales\|f__Streptococcaceae\|g__Streptococcus\|s__Streptococcus_parasanguinis	11
Progression	Degree
k__Bacteria\|p__Firmicutes\|c__Clostridia\|o__Clostridiales\|f__Lachnospiraceae\|g__Blautia\|s__Ruminococcus_obeum	53
k__Bacteria\|p__Firmicutes\|c__Clostridia\|o__Clostridiales\|f__Lachnospiraceae\|g__Dorea\|s__Dorea_longicatena	53
k__Bacteria\|p__Firmicutes\|c__Clostridia\|o__Clostridiales\|f__Clostridiaceae\|g__Clostridium\|s__Clostridium_citroniae	51

“Degree” refers to the number of adjacent nodes of each node in the network, which refers to the number of potential microorganisms interacting with specific microorganisms.