Table 3.
Year | Author | mpMRI Sequences | Features | AUC | SE | SP | I |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2015 | Fehr et al. [15] | T2w, ADC | 18 RFs | 0.83 | - | - | - |
2017 | Barbieri et al. [14] | ADC, IVIM | ADCmean (b[0–900]) | 0.79 | 0.85 | 0.74 | 0.59 |
2018 | Bonekamp et al. [17] | T2w, ADC | 10 RFs | 0.88 | 0.97 | 0.58 | 0.55 |
2019 | Cristel et al. [29] | DCE-MRI | Ktrans | 0.75 | 0.95 | 0.61 | 0.56 |
2019 | Min et al. [9] | T2w, ADC, DWIb1500 | 9 RFs | 0.82 | 0.84 | 0.73 | 0.57 |
2020 | Zhang et al. [16] | T2w, ADC, DWI | 10 RFs | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.73 | 0.53 |
2020 | Hiremath et al. [13] | ADC | ADCmean (b[0–1300]) | 0.85 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.58 |
2021 | Our study | ADC | 2 RFs | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.88 | 0.58 |
2021 | Our study | DWIb2000 | 2 RFs | 0.84 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.65 |
The comparison is based on mpMRI sequences adopted, number of RFs, AUC values, sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP) and informedness (I).