Table 1.
Challenges and solutions to converting multidisciplinary visits to a telemedicine format. For challenges with multiple attempted solutions, we have indicated which solutions were adopted vs. abandoned.
Step | In Person Procedures | Challenges | Telemedicine Solutions |
---|---|---|---|
Scheduling | All visits in person | Determination of in-person vs. telemedicine | Triaging visit types—our group developed criteria to help guide optimal visit format, acknowledging need for flexibility In-person: active or perianal disease; nutrition concerns; potential new diagnosis; no in-person visit >1 year Telemedicine: clinically stable on maintenance medication; on new medication with need to reassess symptoms; newly diagnosed with need to discuss treatment options |
Sign-up for MyChart (EMR-based patient portal) encouraged but optional | MyChart access required for telemedicine visits | When calling to schedule telemedicine appointments, administrative assistants assisted families in creating a MyChart account and provided technical support at the time of the visit | |
Follow-up visits scheduled at check-out | Scheduling process | Provider sends message to administrative assistant in EMR requesting follow up interval and visit type (in-person vs. telemedicine) | |
Clinic templates open 3–6 months in advance | Capacity—templates opened month-by-month | Administrative assistants keep list of patients to be scheduled with timeframe, visit type; contact families when templates open | |
Pre-visit planning | Chart review completed in person | Virtual processes needed | Chart review completed via secure teleconferencing |
Printed recommendations provided in clinic | Virtual processes needed | Recommendations emailed to provider ahead of patient visit | |
Visit flow | Sign-out between providers occurred in shared work room | Virtual sign-out process needed. Concerns regarding efficiency of visits, gaps in care, redundant care | All providers remain for entire telemedicine visit (Abandoned) Pros—Prevented redundancy, sign out not necessary, or could sign out in front of patients/caregivers Cons—Not time-efficient, took away from other clinical duties, may be unable to sign out sensitive material in front of patients/caregivers Sequential video visits with electronic sign-outs (Adopted) Pros—More time-efficient, written sign-out via EMR secure chat preferred (also trialed email but was time-consuming) Cons—Written sign-out still time consuming, concerns remain about redundancy/gaps in care delivered |
Providers could ask caregivers to step out of room for private adolescent history | Virtual process needed. Concern about patient privacy, willingness/ability of caregivers to step out | Providers simply asked parents/caregivers to step out of room and faced no challenges | |
Administration of screening tools | Psychosocial screening forms administered on paper prior to visit | Virtual process needed | Rights to electronic psychosocial screeners purchased, sent to families via MyChart ahead of visit, uploaded into EMR and reviewed at time of visit |
Miscellaneous learnings | Telemedicine helpful to share screen with growth curves and labs Telemedicine improved accuracy of medication and dietary histories; provider could ask patient/family to get products from home for review |