Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 21;8(5):315. doi: 10.3390/children8050315

Table 1.

Challenges and solutions to converting multidisciplinary visits to a telemedicine format. For challenges with multiple attempted solutions, we have indicated which solutions were adopted vs. abandoned.

Step In Person Procedures Challenges Telemedicine Solutions
Scheduling All visits in person Determination of in-person vs. telemedicine Triaging visit types—our group developed criteria to help guide optimal visit format, acknowledging need for flexibility
In-person: active or perianal disease; nutrition concerns; potential new diagnosis; no in-person visit >1 year
Telemedicine: clinically stable on maintenance medication; on new medication with need to reassess symptoms; newly diagnosed with need to discuss treatment options
Sign-up for MyChart (EMR-based patient portal) encouraged but optional MyChart access required for telemedicine visits When calling to schedule telemedicine appointments, administrative assistants assisted families in creating a MyChart account and provided technical support at the time of the visit
Follow-up visits scheduled at check-out Scheduling process Provider sends message to administrative assistant in EMR requesting follow up interval and visit type (in-person vs. telemedicine)
Clinic templates open 3–6 months in advance Capacity—templates opened month-by-month Administrative assistants keep list of patients to be scheduled with timeframe, visit type; contact families when templates open
Pre-visit planning Chart review completed in person Virtual processes needed Chart review completed via secure teleconferencing
Printed recommendations provided in clinic Virtual processes needed Recommendations emailed to provider ahead of patient visit
Visit flow Sign-out between providers occurred in shared work room Virtual sign-out process needed. Concerns regarding efficiency of visits, gaps in care, redundant care All providers remain for entire telemedicine visit (Abandoned)
Pros—Prevented redundancy, sign out not necessary, or could sign out in front of patients/caregivers
Cons—Not time-efficient, took away from other clinical duties, may be unable to sign out sensitive material in front of patients/caregivers
Sequential video visits with electronic sign-outs (Adopted)
Pros—More time-efficient, written sign-out via EMR secure chat preferred (also trialed email but was time-consuming)
Cons—Written sign-out still time consuming, concerns remain about redundancy/gaps in care delivered
Providers could ask caregivers to step out of room for private adolescent history Virtual process needed. Concern about patient privacy, willingness/ability of caregivers to step out Providers simply asked parents/caregivers to step out of room and faced no challenges
Administration of screening tools Psychosocial screening forms administered on paper prior to visit Virtual process needed Rights to electronic psychosocial screeners purchased, sent to families via MyChart ahead of visit, uploaded into EMR and reviewed at time of visit
Miscellaneous learnings Telemedicine helpful to share screen with growth curves and labs
Telemedicine improved accuracy of medication and dietary histories; provider could ask patient/family to get products from home for review