Skip to main content
. 2021 May 16;2021:3772129. doi: 10.1155/2021/3772129

Table 3.

Comparison of endocardial segmentation results by different methods.

Methods Training set size (frame) Computation speed (fps) Dice (%) MAD (mm) HD (mm)
Hansson et al. [33] 0 0.3 2.58 ± 0.85
Qin et al. [34] 450 0.01 90.8 ± 1.7 2.0 ± 0.42 6.86 ± 1.71
Carneiro and Nascimento [35] 496 0.2 1.94 ± 0.51
The method without constraints 252 1.5–1.8 80.103 ± 2.13 7.06 ± 0.85 10.34 ± 3.51
Proposed method 252 2.1–2.25 93.578 ± 1.97 2.57 ± 0.89 6.68 ± 1.78