Table 7.
Incidence and risk factors of recurrence of AIH after LT
| Center sites | Time period | Year | n | Incidence | Time to recurrence (years)a |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spain [330] | 1988–1996 | 1998 | 27 | 9 (33%) | 2.6 ± 1.5 |
| Birmingham, UK [327] | NA | 1999 | 47 | 13 (28%) | 2.4 (0.5–5.3) |
| Paris, France [331] | 1985–1992 | 1999 | 15 | 3 (20%) | 1.6 (1–2.5) |
| New York, USA [332] | 1988–1995 | 2000 | 24 | 6 (25%) | 1.3 ± 0.2 |
| Boston, USA [322] | 1983–1998 | 2000 | 12 | 5 (42%) | NA |
| Rochester, USA [325] | 1985–1998 | 2001 | 41 | 7 (17%) | 4.6 ± 1 |
| Dallas, USA [328] | 1984–1998 | 2002 | 55 | 11 (20%) | NA |
| Paris, France [324] | 1985–1992 | 2003 | 17 | 7 (41%) | 2.5 ± 1.7 |
| Colorado, USA [323] | 1988–2006 | 2008 | 66 | 23 (34.8%) | 4.3 |
| Alberta, Canada [329] | NA | 2009 | 46 | 11 (24%) | 4 ± 1.3 |
| Birmingham, UK [326] | 1999–2014 | 2016 | 69 | 5 (7%) | 3.8 (1.5–7.3) |
NA not available
aTime to recurrence was shown as median (range), or mean ± SD