TABLE 2.
Preclinical pharmacological activities of Cinnamomum genus.
Pharmacological activity | Cinnamum plant/extracts/fractions | Methods | Models cellular lines (in vitro)/animal (in vivo) | Effects/underlying mechanisms | Ref |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Antimicrobial | Cinnamomum altissimum/stem bark/EOs | Disk diffusion | MRSA | IC50 = 12.0 mm | Buru et al. (2014) |
↓bacterial growth | |||||
Microdilution | MRSA | IC50 = 156.25 μg/ml | |||
↓ bacterial growth | |||||
Cinnamom umbejolghota/leaves/EOs | Disk diffusion | Escherichia coli | 19.5 mm | Wannissorn et al. (2005) | |
Salmonella saintpaul | 17.5 mm | ||||
Salmonella derby | 16.5 mm | ||||
Salmonella gallinarum | 34 mm | ||||
Salmonella schwarzergrund | 16.5 mm | ||||
Salmonella mbandaka | 18 mm | ||||
Salmonella monterideo | 16.5 mm | ||||
Cinnamom umburmanni Leaves/EOs | Microdilution | Staphylococcus aureus | IC50 > 2,500 μg/ml | Shan et al. (2007) | |
Listeria monocytogenes | IC50 > 2,500 μg/ml | ||||
Salmonella anatum | IC50 > 2,500 μg/ml | ||||
Escherichia coli | IC50 > 2,500 μg/ml | ||||
Cinnamomum cassia leaves/EOs | Microdilution | Pseudomonas putida | IC50 = 500 mg/L | Oussalah et al. (2006) | |
Cinnamomum cassia leaves/EOs | Microdilution | Bacillus cereus | IC50 = 500 mg/L | Turgis et al. (2012) | |
Escherichia coli | IC50 = 500 mg/L not determined | ||||
Staphylococcus aureus | |||||
Cinnamomum cassia/shoots/methanol | Disk diffusion | Escherichia coli | 13 mm | Kim et al. (2004) | |
Microdilution | IC50 = 250–500 μg/ml | ||||
Cinnamomum cassia bark/EOs | Disk diffusion | Listeria monocytogenes | 22.4 mm | de Oliveira et al. (2012) | |
Microdilution | IC50 = 0.03 μg/ml | ||||
Agar disc diffusion | Bacillus subtilis | 21.1 mm | (Huang et al., 2014) | ||
Salmonella typhimurium | 14.5 mm | ||||
Staphylococcus aureus | 27.5 mm | ||||
Microdilution | Staphylococcus aureus | IC50 = 2.5–5 mg/ml | |||
Microdilution assay | Bacillus subtilis | IC50 = 10 mg/ml | |||
Salmonella typhimurium | IC50 = 20 mg/ml | ||||
Escherichia coli | IC50 = 10 mg/ml | ||||
Permeability of cell membrane | Staphylococcus aureus | ↑ permeability of wall cell | |||
Escherichia coli | |||||
Cinnamomum chemungianum leaves/EOs | Disk diffusion | Staphylococcus aureus | 7 mm | Rameshkumar et al. (2007) | |
Bacillus subtilis | 8 mm | ||||
Salmonella typhi | 9 mm | ||||
Escherichia coli | 12 mm | ||||
Pseudomonas fluorescens | 7 mm | ||||
Proteus vulgaris | 7 mm | ||||
Klebsiella pneumoniae | 11 mm | ||||
Cinnamomumim pressicostatum stem bark/VO | Disk diffusion | MRSA | 14.5 mm | Buru et al. (2014) | |
Microdilution | IC50 = 156.3 μg/ml | ||||
Cinnamomum iners stem bark/VO | Disk diffusion | MRSA | 10.5 mm | Buru et al. (2014) | |
Microdilution | IC50 = 625.0 μg/ml | ||||
Cinnamomum longepaniculatum leaves/VO | Microdilution | Escherichia coli | IC50 = 3.1 μL/ml | Li et al. (2014) | |
Salmonella enteritidis | IC50 = 6.3 μL/ml | ||||
Staphylococcus aureus | IC50 = 6.3 μL/ml | ||||
Cinnamomummicranthum leaves/EOs | Diffusion method | Vibrio parahemolyticus | 2 mm | Yeh et al. (2009) | |
Vibrio alginolyticus | 3 mm | ||||
Vibrio alginolyticus | 3 mm | ||||
Vibrio vulnificus | 2 mm | ||||
Lactococcus garvieae | 1 mm | ||||
Debaryomyces hansenii | 1 mm | ||||
Photobacteria damsel | 1 mm | ||||
Streptococcus sp | 1 mm | ||||
Eromonas hydrophila | 2 mm | ||||
Cinnamomum micranthum twig/EOs | Diffusion method | Vibrio parahemolyticus | 5 mm | ||
Vibrio alginolyticus | 5 mm | ||||
Vibrio alginolyticus | 6 mm | ||||
Vibrio vulnificus | 5 mm | ||||
Lactococcusgarvieae | 3 mm | ||||
Debaryomyces hansenii | 4 mm | ||||
Photobacteria damsel | 7 mm | ||||
Streptococcus sp | 7 mm | ||||
Eromonas hydrophila | 1 mm | ||||
Cinnamomum osmophloeum leaves/EOs | Microdilution | Escherichia coli | IC50 = 250 μg/ml | Chang et al. (2001), Chang et al. (2008) | |
Enterococcus faecalis | IC50 = 250 μg/ml | ||||
Klebsiella pneumoniae | IC50 = 500 μg/ml | ||||
Salmonella sp | IC50 = 500 μg/ml | ||||
Vibrio parahemolyticus | IC50 = 250 μg/ml | ||||
Staphylococcus epidermidis | IC50 = 250 μg/ml | ||||
MRSA | IC50 = 250 μg/ml | ||||
Legionella pneumophila | IC50 = 1,000 μg/ml | ||||
Cinnamomum porrectum stem bark/VO | Disk diffusion | MRSA | 7.5 mm | Buru et al. (2014) | |
Microdilution | IC50 = 500 μg/ml | ||||
Cinnamomum tamala stem bark/methanolic extract | Agar well diffusion | Escherichia coli | Without inhibition | Goyal et al. (2009) | |
Salmonella typhi | 11 mm | ||||
Bacillus cereus | 14 mm | ||||
Bacillus subtilis | 14 mm | ||||
Staphylococcus aureus | 20 mm | ||||
Streptococcus pyogenes | 13.5 mm | ||||
Staphylococcus aureus | IC50 = 256 μg/ml | ||||
Streptococcus pyogenes | IC50 = 4,096 μg/ml | ||||
Bacillus subtilis | IC50 = 4,096 μg/ml | ||||
Cinnamomum verum bark/EOs | Microdilution | Staphylococcus aureus | IC50 = 0.55 mg/ml | Unlu et al. (2010) | |
Streptococcus pyogenes | IC50 = 0.55 mg/ml | ||||
Streptococcus pneumoniae | IC50 < 0.04 mg/ml | ||||
Enterococcus faecalis | IC50 = 1.15 mg/ml | ||||
Enterococcus faecium | IC50 = 1.12 mg/ml | ||||
Bacillus cereus | IC50 = 0.56 mg/ml | ||||
Acinetobacter lwoffii | IC50 < 0.04 mg/ml | ||||
Enterobacter erogenes | IC50 = 0.56 mg/ml | ||||
Escherichia coli | IC50 = 1.12 mg/ml | ||||
Klebsiella pneumoniae | IC50 = 0.14 mg/ml | ||||
Proteus mirabilis | IC50 = 0.14 mg/ml | ||||
Pseudomonas eruginosa | IC50 = 0.28 mg/ml | ||||
Salmonella typhimurium | IC50 = 0.14 mg/ml | ||||
Mycobacterium smegmatis | IC50 = 0.07 mg/ml | ||||
Clostridium perfringens | IC50 = 0.14 mg/ml | ||||
Listeria ivanovii | IC50 = 0.56 mg/ml | ||||
Listeria innocua | IC50 = 0.28 mg/ml | ||||
Listeria welshimeri | IC50 = 0.56 mg/ml | ||||
Listeria seeligeri | IC50 = 0.56 mg/ml | ||||
Cinnamomum verum bark/aqueous | Disk diffusion | Moraxella cattarhalis | 11 mm | Rasheed and Thajuddin. (2011) | |
Microdilution | Moraxella cattarhalis | IC50 = 120 mg/ml | |||
Cinnamomum verum bark/EOs | Microdilution | Pseudomonas eruginosa | IC50 = 0.1125 mg/ml | Utchariyakiat et al. (2016) | |
Cinnamomum verum bark/methanolic | Disk diffusion | Proteus mirabilis | 5 mm | Hameed et al., (2016) | |
Pseudomonas eurogenosa | 4 mm | ||||
Escherichia coli | 5.4 mm | ||||
Klebsiella pneumonia | 6 mm | ||||
Staphylococcus aureus | 5.2 mm | ||||
Cinnamomum verum bark/EOs | Microdilution | Acinetobacter spp. | IC50 = 625 μg/ml | Guerra et al., (2012), Noudeh et al., (2010) | |
Staphyllococcus aureus | IC50 = 0.2 mg/ml | ||||
Bacillus subtilis | IC50 = 0.4 mg/ml | ||||
Escherichia coli | IC50 = 0.1 mg/ml | ||||
Pseudomonas eruginosa | IC50 = 0.2 mg/ml | ||||
Agrobacterium tumefaciens | IC50 = 12.5 mg/ml | ||||
Disk diffusion | Staphylococcus aureus | 17.2 mm | Al-Bayati and Mohammed, (2009) | ||
Bacillus cereus | 18.3 mm | ||||
Escherichia coli | 15.7 mm | ||||
Proteus mirabilis | 15.2 mm | ||||
Klebsiella pneumonia | 17.5 mm | ||||
Pseudomonas eruginosa | 14.4 mm | ||||
Staphylococcus aureus | IC50 = 62.5 μg/ml | ||||
Bacillus cereus | IC50 = 1.2 μg/ml | ||||
Escherichia coli | IC50 = 62.5 μg/ml | ||||
Proteus mirabilis | IC50 = 125.0 μg/ml | ||||
Klebsiella pneumonia | MIC = 62.5 μg/ml | ||||
Pseudomonas eruginosa | MIC = 125.0 μg/ml | ||||
Membrane permeability reduction test | Escherichia coli | ↓wall cell permeability | Yap et al. (2015) | ||
Microdilution | Pseudomonas putida | IC50 = 1 mg/ml | Oussalah et al. (2006) | ||
Antidiabetic | In vitro studies | ||||
Cinnamomum verum bark/aqueous | α-amylase, a-glucosidase inhibition | IC50 = 0.5, 1.25, 2.5 mg/ml | Ranilla et al. (2010) | ||
↓α-amylase, ↓α-glucosidase | |||||
Cinnamomum verum bark/methanol | Yeast a-glucosidase, rat-intestinal a-glucosidase inhibition | IC50 = 5.83 μg/ml | Shihabudeen et al. (2011) | ||
↓yeast a-glucosidase | |||||
IC50 = 670 μg/ml | |||||
↓mammalian a-glucosidase | |||||
Cinnamomum cassia (L.) J. Presl/Bark/acetone and aqueous | Glucosidase, sucrase, maltase inhibition | ↓α-glucosidase inhibitory activity ↑ sucrase and maltase inhibition | Kang et al. (2014) | ||
Cinnamomum osmophloeum twig/aqueous | PTP1B, a-glucosidase,α-amylase inhibition | ↓ a-amylase, ↓α-glucosidase ↓ PTP1B | Lin et al. (2016) | ||
In vivo studies | |||||
Cinnamomum burmanni (nees and T. Nees) blume/bark/aqueous | Rats/very high fat diet induced hyperglycemia 500, 300 mg/b.w.; oral | ↓FBG, dose dependent manner | Cheng et al. (2012) | ||
Cinnamomum cassia (L.) J. Presl/bark/aqueous | Rats/glucose 2 g/kg b.w. ip; 85.7 mg/b.w oral | ↓blood glucose control: Glibenclamide | Verspohl et al. (2005) | ||
Cinnamomum cassia (L.) J.Presl/aqueous | Mice/STZ induced diabetes; 100 mg/kg/day; oral | ↓blood glucose | Chen et al. (2013) | ||
↑insulin | |||||
Cinnamomum cassia (L.) J.Presl/Bark/Methanol | Mice/STZ induced diabetes; 200 mg/b.w.; oral | ↓ blood glucose | Kim et al. (2006) | ||
Cinnamomum cassia (L.) J. Presl bark/aqueous | Rats/alloxan induced diabetes 60 mg/b.w.; oral | ↓blood glucose | Kamble and Rambhimaiah, (2015) | ||
Cinnamomum porrectum bark/polyphenols rich extract | Rats/STZ induced diabetes 100,200,300 mg/b.w.; oral | ↓blood glucose | Jia et al. (2009) | ||
Cinnamomum tamala/leaves/ethanol | Rats/alloxan induced diabetes; 500 mg/b.w.; oral | ↓ blood glucose | Kar et al. (2003) | ||
Cinnamomum tamala leaves/essential oil | Rats/STZ induced diabetes 10, 200 mg/b.w.; oral | ↓ blood glucose | Kumar et al. (2012) | ||
Cinnamomum verum bark/water-soluble polyphenols | Rats/STZ induced diabetes 200 mg/kg, oral | ↑weight loss ↓FBG, ↓PPG | Krishnakumar et al. (2014) | ||
Cinnamomum verum bark/volatile oil | Rats/STZ induced diabetes 20 mg/kg; oral | ↓plasma glucose | Subash Babu et al. (2007) | ||
Cinnamomum verum essential oil | Rats/STZ induced diabetes 20 mg/kg; oral | ↓blood glucose | Al-LogmaniI and Zari, (2009) | ||
Cinnamomum verum stem bark/chloroform | Rats/STZ induced diabetes 20 mg/kg; oral | ↑muscle glycogen | Anand et al. (2010) | ||
↑hepatic glycogen | |||||
↓FBG | |||||
Cinnamomum verum bark/volatile oil | Rats/alloxan induced diabetes 5, 10, 20 mg/kg; oral | ↓FBG, dose-dependent manner | Mishra et al. (2010) | ||
↓cholesterol | |||||
↓urinary protein | |||||
↓TBARS | |||||
↓blood urea | |||||
↓catalase | |||||
Cinnamomum verum bark/volatile oil | Rats/alloxan induced diabetes | ↓FBG, dose-dependent manner | Rajbir et al. (2009) | ||
5, 10 and 20 mg/kg; oral | |||||
Cinnamomumverum sticks/Aqueous | Rats/STZ induced diabetes | ↓blood glucose, dose-dependent manner | Shen et al. (2010) | ||
3, 30 and 100 mg/kg; oral | |||||
Cinnamomumverum bark/aqueous | Rats/oral glucose tolerance test | ↓glycemic levels | Kannappan et al. (2006) | ||
0.2 ml day/rat; oral | |||||
Cinnamomum verum/bark/methanol | Rats/STZ induced diabetes | ↓ postprandial hyperglycemia | Shihabudeen et al. (2011) | ||
300 mg/kg; oral | |||||
Anti-inflammatory | In vitro studies | ||||
Cinnamomum cassia/cinnamic aldehyde | RAW 264.7, LPS stimulated mice macrophages | IC50= 0, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50 μM anti-inflammatory | Liao et al. (2012a) | ||
Cinnamomum camphora/total crude extract/80% methanol, hexane, ethyl acetate fractions | RAW 264.7, LPS stimulated mice macrophages | IC50= 100 μg/ml anti-inflammatory | Lee et al. (2006) | ||
In vivo studies | |||||
Cinnamomum cassia bark oil/cinnamaldehyde | Rats | dose = 2–6 mg/kg bw | Chua et al. (2008) | ||
↓NF-kB | |||||
Cinnamomum cassia cinnamic aldehyde | Mice/carrageenan induced paw edema | dose = 1.25, 2.5, 5 mg/kg/bw | Liao et al. (2012a) | ||
Anti-inflammatory | |||||
Anti-cancer | In vitro studies | ||||
C. burmanni stem bark/methanolic | NPC/HK1, C666–1, human cancer cell lines | ↑cytotoxicity | Daker et al. (2013) | ||
IC50 = 224.3 μg/ml | |||||
IC50 = 6.30 μg/ml | |||||
C. cassia bark aqueous | SiHa, human cervical carcinoma cell lines | ↓growth of cancer cells | Koppikar et al. (2010) | ||
↑cytotoxicity | |||||
IC50 = 80 μg/ml | |||||
C. cassia ethanolic extract | HT 29, HCT 116, human colorectal carcinoma cell lines | ↑Nrf2 | Wondrak et al. (2010) | ||
↑antioxidant | |||||
C. burmann stem bark/aqueous | Lymphoma, melanoma, mice cancer cell lines | ↓tumor cell growth | Kwon et al. (2010) | ||
↑cytotoxicity | |||||
IC50 = 0.5 mg/ml | |||||
Cinnamomum species cinnamaldehyde | Hep G2, hepatoma cells line | ↑apoptosis | Ng and Wu. (2011) | ||
↑p53, ↑APO-1 | |||||
↑cytotoxicity | |||||
IC50 = 9.8 μM | |||||
C. subavenium miq subamolide D subamolide E | SW 480, human colon adenocarcinoma cell lines A431, SCC1 human epidermoid carcinoma cells A375, human melanoma cell lines | ↑DNA damage | Kuo et al. (2008); Yang et al. (2013) | ||
↑cytotoxicity | |||||
IC50 = 9.12 μg/ml | |||||
IC50 = 13.30 μg/ml | |||||
IC50 = 17.59 μg/ml | |||||
C. subavenium miq subamolide B, A | NTUB1, human urothelial carcinoma cell line SW480, human colon adenocarcinoma cell line | ↓tyrosinase | Chen et al. (2007); Wang et al. (2011) | ||
↑apoptosis | |||||
C. tenuifolium/butanolides | DU145, human prostate cancer cell line | ↓mitochondrial transmembrane potential | Lin et al. (2009) | ||
↑cytochrome C | |||||
↑caspase-9/caspase-3 ↑cytotoxicity | |||||
Neuroprotective | In vitro studies | ||||
Cinnamomum species water extract/procyanidin type a trimer | C6 glial cells, OGD exposed | ↓glial cell swelling | Panickar et al. (2012) | ||
↓glutamate uptake | |||||
Cinnamomum cassia/extract/cinnamaldehyde | BV2 microglias, LPS activated | ↓neuroinflammation | Ho et al. (2013) | ||
IC50 = 50 μg/ml | |||||
In vivo studies | |||||
Cinnamomum species trans-cinnamaldehyde | Mice/6-OHDA treated intracerebroventricular | Anti-neuroinflammatory | Pyo et al. (2013) | ||
Dose = 30 mg/kg | |||||
Cinnamomum zeylanicum bark extract | Rats/SCOP treated intravenous | ↑cognition dose = 100, 200, 400 mg/kg | Jain et al. (2015) | ||
Others pharmacological activities | In vivo studies | ||||
Cinnamomum zeylanicum/stem bark/methanol extract | Rats/l-name-induced hypertension, intravenous | Antihypertensive | Nyadjeu et al. (2011) | ||
dose = 5, 10, 20 mg/kg | |||||
Cinnamomum zeylanicum/bark and leaf/EOs | Culex quinquefasciatus, Anopheles tessellatus and Aedes egypti | Mosquitocidal | Samarasekera et al. (2005) | ||
Bark oil | |||||
A. essellatus | |||||
LD50 = 0.33 μg/ml | |||||
C. uinquefasciatus | |||||
LD50 = 0.66 μg/ml leaf oil | |||||
LD50 = 1.03–2.1 μg/ml | |||||
Cinnamomum zeylanicum bark/EOs | Pediculushumanus capitis | Ovicidal, adulticidal activities | Yang et al. (2005) | ||
LD50 = 0.5 mg/cm2 | |||||
Cinnamomum zeylanicum bark/aqueous suspension | Rats | Anti-secretagogue | Alqasoumi. (2012) | ||
Antiulcer | |||||
dose = 250, 500 mg/kg b.w | |||||
Cinnamomum zeylanicum bark/ethanol extract | Rats | Pro-healing effect | Kamath et al. (2003); Farahpour and Habibi. (2012) | ||
dose = 250, 500 mg/kg b.w | |||||
Cinnamomum zeylanicum bark/ethanol extract | Rats/CCl4-induced liver injury | ↑hepatoprotective | Eidi et al. (2012) | ||
Dose = 0.01, 0.05, 0.1 g/kg |
Abbreviations and symbols: ↑, increase; ↓, decrease; APOA-1, Apolipoprotein A-1; bw, body weight; FBG, fasting blood glucose; L-NAME, N(G)-nitro-L-arginine-methyl ester, LPS, lipopolysaccharide; p53, tumorprotein p53; PPG, postprandial plasma glucose; PTP1B, protein-tyrosine phosphatase; NF-κB, nuclear factor κB; OGD, oxygen-glucose deprivation; 6-OHDA, 6-hydroxydopamine; SCOP, scopolamine; STZ, streptozotocin; TBARS, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances.