Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 24;124(11):1873–1881. doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01277-1

Table 4.

Post-diagnostic total coffee and total tea consumption in relation to mortality after breast cancer diagnosis in the Nurses’ Health Study and Nurses’ Health Study II, stratified by oestrogen receptor status (n = 8353), insulin receptor status (n = 2488) and molecular subtypes (n = 5294).

Breast cancer subtype No. of deaths Breast cancer-specific mortality HR (95% CI) per 1 cup/day No. of deaths All-cause mortality HR (95% CI) per 1 cup/day
Total coffee
Oestrogen receptor status
 Oestrogen receptor-positive 756 0.91 (0.86–0.97) 1831 0.91 (0.88–0.95)
 Oestrogen receptor-negative 209 0.97 (0.85–1.09) 441 0.95 (0.87–1.04)
 P for heterogeneity 0.71 0.99
Insulin receptor status
Insulin receptor-positive 174 1.06 (0.93–1.22) 466 0.99 (0.91–1.08)
 Insulin receptor-negative 211 0.88 (0.78–0.99) 544 0.92 (0.85–0.99)
 P for heterogeneity 0.008 0.12
Molecular subtype
 Luminal A 307 0.88 (0.80–0.98) 804 0.90 (0.85–0.96)
 Luminal B 154 0.83 (0.72–0.97) 345 0.88 (0.80–0.97)
 HER2-enriched 43 1.30 (0.92–1.84) 80 1.05 (0.84–1.32)
 Basal-like 45 0.93 (0.67–1.28) 99 0.91 (0.74–1.13)
 P for heterogeneity 0.86 0.77
Total tea
Oestrogen receptor status
 Oestrogen receptor-positive 756 0.99 (0.92–1.08) 1831 0.97 (0.92–1.02)
 Oestrogen receptor-negative 209 0.89 (0.75–1.05) 441 0.94 (0.84–1.05)
 P for heterogeneity 0.28 0.69
Insulin receptor status
 Insulin receptor-positive 174 0.85 (0.69–1.04) 466 0.91 (0.81–1.03)
 Insulin receptor-negative 211 0.99 (0.82–1.18) 544 0.96 (0.85–1.07)
 P for heterogeneity 0.41 0.50
Molecular subtype
 Luminal A 307 0.96 (0.84–1.09) 804 0.90 (0.83–0.98)
 Luminal B 154 1.02 (0.85–1.24) 345 0.96 (0.84–1.09)
 HER2-enriched 43 0.77 (0.46–1.30) 80 0.91 (0.66–1.27)
 Basal-like 45 1.18 (0.82–1.70) 99 1.13 (0.89–1.44)
 P for heterogeneity 0.42 0.06

Note: Models were stratified by cohort and adjusted for age at diagnosis (year), calendar year of diagnosis, time between diagnosis and first FFQ (year), calendar year at start of follow-up of each-2-year questionnaire cycle, pre-diagnostic BMI (<20, 20 to <22.5, 22.5 to <25, 25.0 to <30, 30 to <35, ≥35 kg/m2, missing), BMI change after diagnosis (no change (≥−0.5 to ≤0.5 kg/m2), decrease (<−0.5 kg/m2), increase (>0.5–2 kg/m2), increase (>2 kg/m2), missing), post-diagnostic smoking (never, past, current 1–14 cigarettes/day, current 15–24 cigarettes/day, current ≥25 cigarettes/day, missing), post-diagnostic physical activity (<5, 5 to <11.5, 11.5 to <22, ≥22 MET-h/week, missing), oral contraceptive use (ever, never), post-diagnostic alcohol consumption (<0.15, 0.15 to <2.0, 2.0 to 7.5, ≥7.5 g/day), post-diagnostic total energy intake (quintiles, kcal/day), pre-diagnostic menopausal status, age at menopause, and postmenopausal hormone use status (premenopausal; postmenopausal, age at menopause<50 year and never postmenopausal hormone use; postmenopausal, age at menopause <50 year and past postmenopausal hormone use; postmenopausal, age at menopause <50 year and current postmenopausal hormone use; postmenopausal, age at menopause ≥50 year and never postmenopausal hormone use; postmenopausal, age at menopause ≥50 year and past postmenopausal hormone use; postmenopausal, age at menopause ≥50 year and current postmenopausal hormone use; missing), post-diagnostic aspirin use (never, past, current, missing), race (non-Hispanic white, other), stage of disease (I, II, III), ER/PR status (ER/PR-positive, ER-positive and PR-negative, ER/PR-negative, missing), radiotherapy (yes, no, missing), chemotherapy (yes, no, missing), and hormonal treatment (yes, no, missing). For oestrogen receptor status and molecular subtype analyses, we did not adjust for ER/PR status.