Skip to main content
. 2021 May 11;11:661048. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.661048

Table 1.

AUC and diagnostic value of different biomarkers for predicting LST.

AUC 95% CI Sensitivity Specificity Youden Index
Detection LST from HC ETBF 0.795 0.735 0.855 0.752 0.797 0.549
Ps 0.887 0.842 0.931 0.936 0.726 0.661
Pm 0.842 0.790 0.893 0.706 0.850 0.556
ETBF+Ps 0.904 0.864 0.944 0.899 0.788 0.687
ETBF+Pm 0.880 0.835 0.925 0.844 0.823 0.667
Ps+Pm 0.909 0.871 0.947 0.862 0.814 0.677
ETBF+Ps+Pm 0.922 0.887 0.958 0.881 0.814 0.695
Detection LST from CRA ETBF 0.645 0.584 0.707 0.725 0.620 0.345
Ps 0.807 0.760 0.854 0.844 0.678 0.522
Pm 0.787 0.735 0.840 0.706 0.769 0.476
ETBF+Ps 0.808 0.761 0.855 0.835 0.688 0.522
ETBF+Pm 0.791 0.739 0.842 0.633 0.841 0.474
Ps+Pm 0.835 0.790 0.879 0.762 0.808 0.569
ETBF+Ps+Pm 0.835 0.790 0.879 0.762 0.808 0.569

HC, healthy control; CRA, colorectal adenoma; LST, laterally spreading tumor; ETBF, Enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis; Ps, Peptostreptococcus stomatis; Pm, Parvimonas micra.