Skip to main content
. 2021 May 25;16(6):2025–2037. doi: 10.1007/s11468-021-01455-0

Table 2.

Sensing performance comparison with other published results

Sensor configuration Sensitivity FWHM Rmin FOM
Proposed structure 130.3 11.86 0.01587 692.28
Au-Si-MX2 [45] 147.88 16.2417 0.024099 377.81
TiO2-SiO2-Ag-MoS2-Graphene [50] 98 1.102 Not reported Not reported
Au-MoS2-Graphene [51] 89.29 6.80 0.025 525.2
Cr-Ag-ITO [52] 68.77 1.64 0.0903 464.37
ZnO-Ag-Au-graphene [53] 76 5 0.04 380
ZnO-Au-MoS2-Graphene [54] 101.58 6.73 Not reported Not reported
Cu-MoS2-Graphene [55] 79.12 2.89 0.0785 348.755
Air-MoS2-Al-MoS2-Graphene [56] 190.83 19 0.04 251.09
Mirrored bilayer of Au-MoS2-Graphene [47] 75.2 17 0.1 44.23
Au-Graphene [57] 53.71 5 0.1252 85.79
Chalcogenide Prism-Au-Graphene [58] 40 2.5 0.1 160
Graphene nanoribbons [59] 160 0.86 not reported not reported